all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 28 points 2 years ago

Well duh. That's the whole point of carbon credits at this point.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Of COURSE it is.

    BTW. Who gets this carbon offset money anyway, and what do they do with it?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    If they actually worked, it would be payment to somebody who has taken an action to prevent emissions they otherwise would not have prevented. In practice, it's 90% middlemen who claim to have paid somebody to take such an action, but no such action actually occurred, or a completely ineffective action occurred.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    Oh no, maybe the EU had a point making this kind of bullshit illegal?

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    No shit. Companies can simply say they are offseting opposed to actually doing anything. It like asking a Capitan Planet villain to be honest.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    It “may” be? What kind of cockamamie reporting is this

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    That’s not possible 😅🙈

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    To the surprise of absolutely nobody.

  • source
  • [+] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
    [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    If I remember correctly, this was a plot point in Kim Stanley Robinson's The Ministry for the Future. There are cheaper offsets that are there for the taking, but every company must meet a certain quota, so if you buy the cheap ones, great, but if you hold out and are left with expensive ones that you can't afford, you are fined, and the money is put into the offsets anyway.

    I could be totally misremembering it. Honestly, I didn't enjoy the book that much.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    It's even worse. The places that sell carbon offsets are often poorer parts of the world. The selling is essentially a privatization of carbon sinks. As is tradition, these privatizations are very under-priced. Worse still, as they're selling carbon sinks, they will not have those carbon sinks for themselves in the future if they choose to "develop" and emit more GHGs... they'll have to buy carbon credits from some other fools and the prices are not likely to be lower.

    It's all very silly.

  • source