this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
25 points (96.3% liked)

[Dormant] Electric Vehicles

3207 readers
2 users here now

We have moved to:

[email protected]

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion.
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling.
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The UK is tiny, why not just electrify the line?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

Still requires a much higher initial investment along with maintenance. Which I believe will be harder to get approval for than just different trains. Another factor could also be that the tracks are maybe not owned by the train companies. Making it even more difficult to get any large investments in electrification approved.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

From what I understand a lot of the UK rail network is reliant on old infrastructure, think Victorian era bridges/tunnels. These weren't designed with rail electrification in mind so may not have room for a train and an overhead line for example. While there may be solutions for each individual instance of this sort of problem, solving them involves addressing each of them individually and takes more time and money than electrification would in a vacuum.