It is absolutely wild to me that chuds don't care at all against police violence towards poor people and POC, but a "democrat sherriff" euthanizes a squirrel and suddenly the entire system needs to be brought to its knees. I know its disingenuous, that they don't really care, its just a shitty call to action, but fuck me man
The Dredge Tank
The Dredge Tank. For posting all the low tier reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else. Got some bullshit from Reddit with 2 upvotes and want to share, post it here.
This community was created with the purpose that Rule 8 fans will just block it.
The rules are literally The Dunk Tank's rules, just without rule 8.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
They should claim the squirrel was Palestinian
The squirrels are hamas!!!!
You are voting in a nation of 0.3 billion people and your concerns are "A" squarel, "A" racoon and "A" gorilla. American elections are useless but even this is too pointless
This is what is left after all traces of materialist thought are eradicated.
Don't ask them about all the pets directly killed by Trump supporting cops.
Lmao why the fuck is this a culture war issue? Someone please explain, it's like Americans are living in bizzaro world.
Because something something new york something something small business something government overreach.
Seriously though, avenge the squirrel.
Seriously though, avenge the squirrel.
Me cascading into Chatterstorm after the table decimates my board state.
DAE LE REGULATIONS BAD
Is that literally it? What a joke
Squirrel?
Tragic story but what the hell does this have to do with the election?
Chud/lib voter mobilization fantasies.
If Trump wins, the libs won't shut up, and if Kamala wins, the chuds will do another jan 6th and the libs still won't shut up. The election is eternal and all consuming 😔
I wanted to know more, too, so I went looking and found this: the Trump campaign is using Peanut as a talking point
The cops were democrats, of course.
All
Cops
Are
🅱️emocrats
OK, so that's the squirrel, the gorilla is Harambe (it's been eight years ffs), so what's the deal with the raccoon?
I think the same people had a pet racoon that was also euthanised
Conservatives rn.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Conker's Bad Fur Day
For a moment I thought these were democrats who understood the Squirrel's euthanasia to be Trump's fault, the same way they see police brutality under Biden and then actually say that this will be Trump's America
I HATE CONCERN TROLLING
I HATE CONCERN TROLLING
These chuds tend to be animal cruelty enjoyers (especially of the "every animal that a vegan doesn't eat I will eat two!" variety) and a lot of them abuse their pets, treating them the way they treat their spouses and children.
Unredeemable.
They're not actually concern trolling though. It's just typical conservative in-group out-group stuff again. Dogs are in, cats mostly, rescued or "rescued" animals most definitely, even when they're usually versions hunted for sport and/or factory farmed. On the latter I'm kind of unsure as to whether some notion of bootstrap plays into it.
Much like with everything else they just don't realize this in-group and out-group thing, albeit that's not even limited to actual chuds as per animals.
I'm not as certain they actually care that much about squirrels, even with what you say.
They don't care about* squirrels*, they care about these two specific squirrels (or, well, one of them, none of them having read the actual story) because they got their heartstrings tucked by coverage about it.
That still sounds like concern trolling to me; I really doubt Harambe actually mattered to them either except as some edgy in-joke.
I have nothing to back it up but from personal experience most people do hate the idea of bad things happening to animals, it's just most of it is out of sight, out of mind. They don't think about where their steaks come from or, even if you'd point towards some monkey killing buisiness in the wild as per harambe, where the factory feed comes from. Doesn't really matter whether they're aware of the links there or not, it's just how things is.
But then Harambe isn't how things is, there's not supposed to be children in gorilla enclosures. Of course, the question as to whether there should even be gorilla enclosures also doesn't play - that's just how things is - but the child in the gorilla enclosure is where their brain starts to connect "this was unnecessary", because it's easily solved, Cincinnati Zoo just has to put up some bigger fences or whatever, job's done, animal cruelty issue solved.
I like how the AI seems to have attempted to make the gorilla and the racoon look realistic and then went "fuck it, I'm going full cartoon on the squirrel"