So, $15k per person terminated?
this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
165 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
1618 readers
153 users here now
Which posts fit here?
Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
[email protected]
[email protected]
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
15k to ruin someone’s livelihood? I’ll take 2000, please!
Man what a great system.
We gotta give them a huge tax break too! That way it'll trickle down straight into the CEO's pocket!
So the company still gained, but with that money they could have cut 300 less employees and that would have been 300 people making 100k/year instead of one guy making 30.6m more...
ummm... 👉👈 Tax the rich, maybe?
He does look turtly enough for the turtle club.
Providing nothing that isn't covered by other areas of the business, while profiting off the misery of others?
Guillotine.
despite
Yeah, that's not how capitalism works.
When CEOs say they feel it when they need to do layoffs, I think they mean in their wallets.
they probably don't feel anything when making any kind of purchase, it's more like raw unfiltered greed
"Because of." The phrase that's meant to be used here is "because of".
$30.6m/2000 is $15.3k per employee laid off, basically a full time minimum wage job. Fucking unreal that you can justify one person getting a raise that could support 2000 people's entire livelihood. Obviously, these Microsoft employees were not earning minimum wage, but its still outrageous.
I don't think the board pays CEOs according to how many jobs they save. I don't know where you got that idea.
In fact I'm pretty sure that the more people they get rid of, the better paid they are.
Fun Fact: Micro$oft is an evil-as-shit corporation and always has been.
Well... he needs that money. Gosh!