this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
833 points (99.3% liked)

Memes

45450 readers
1970 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You will go straight to jail 😑😑😑

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

excellent psa

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

Doesn't NYT cut off most of the article now? I used to just be able to disable JS but that didn't work anymore last I checked.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I use this extension and it lets me bypass pretty every paywall including NYT's

[–] [email protected] 1 points 34 seconds ago

Best extension along with uBlock Origins!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 53 minutes ago (1 children)

Warning. Russian orc website. Beware.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 26 minutes ago (1 children)

If you're afraid of visiting Russian websites, piracy is probably not for you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 minutes ago (1 children)

Russian websites aren’t the problem. Software from Russian websites potentially is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 minutes ago (1 children)

What a bullshit argument. Oh yes, untrusted software from random sites in any other top-level domain is safe.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 minutes ago

Shouldnt you be on the ukraine front lines with your commrades?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Yeah the article stub doesn't link to the article. It links to a login flow with the article id. If you go directly to the article you get redirected if you don't have a session.

It's incredibly easy to make an impossible to get around paywall. Porn has done it since the Internet existed.

In this very particular situation I'm glad most companies are lazy and stupid.

I don't particularly care if a company does pay only content. I think its legitimately ok. I hate companies that don't make you pay enough for the service to cover their costs thus leading to complete enshitifaction.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago

I thought the issue was they wanted search engines to be able to see the content, but not non paying viewers? Hence slightly shitty paywalls.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

It's incredibly easy to make an impossible to get around paywall.

Sure, but the easily-bypassed js method makes sure it’s still crawlable by search engines, which is a trade well worth making where I work. Doesn’t matter as much for porn sites since the title and description aren’t the content most people are there for, so you can expose them on the paywall page.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Maybe they have a way to unblock major search engine crawlers but block it for everyone else now? I know Cloudflare was doing something similar for some bot protection mechanism, and this seems like something news outlets would want to do also.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Very true. I don't disagree at all. I think once google finally becomes totally useless. It won't matter.

I mean Google is already just Yellow Pages AdWords edition with AI content

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Brave browser has a filter to bypass paywalls. Works on desktop and mobile versions. Definitely works on NYT as I just read something there today. And of course has built in adblock. You can also add additional filters and adblock lists.

Bonus: print to PDF in Brave to share an article with someone else. It retains all the graphics relevant to the article and cuts all the junk and ads out too.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 hours ago

Absolutely do not inspect elements and start deleting stuff! Leave them alone!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Brave browser has a filter to bypass paywalls. Works on desktop and mobile versions. Definitely works on NYT as I just read something there today. And of course has built in adblock. You can also add additional filters and adblock lists.

Bonus: print to PDF in Brave to share an article with someone else. It retains all the graphics relevant to the article and cuts all the junk and ads out too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

brave has a filter you can add to auto-bypass paywalls already right there to be selected after install

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Came to say this. And they make mobile browsers. If I want to share a paywalled article with someone I just load it up in brave and print it to PDF then send them that. Works every time!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I always break the ctrl key right off my keyboard when I get a new computer so I don't accidentally do this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

I do that with the windows key...

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

12ft hardly works for anything for me anymore deeper-sadness

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, unfortunately 12ft.io didn't keep up with the paywall arms race. It's too bad because it was one of those things that a lot of people knew about, many of whom may now just give up when it doesn't work even though there are other options out there.

As one example, there's now also the 13ft ladder: https://github.com/wasi-master/13ft It's like 12ft but self hosted. Sounds really good but I can't vouch for it yet.

I mostly would just archive a paywallrd page with archive.is (aka archive.today, archive.ph, etc.) and that worked great and also helped take traffic away from asshole sites that paywall content. Unfortunately, archive started requiring a cloud flare captcha when archiving a page. This is a deal breaker for me since captcha totally deanonymizes you and is used for tracking purposes and even to train AI. So it defeats a good chunk of the purpose of using an archive site.

Still, there's a good chance that someone else already archived the page you want to see, so putting the url in archive.is search can be enough to bypass the paywall.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Cool thing about this is that it pretends to be GoogleBot to remove annoyances

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

there's no new big wall of information from the NY Times. ask them, what's the scoop? my opinion, take a moment. wtf are you doing?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago

I just use Bypass Paywalls Clean, or failing that, archive.vn.

[–] [email protected] 106 points 9 hours ago (8 children)

12ft.io almost never works for me tbh.

Also, appending before something is called prepending, similar to how a prefix after something is a suffix.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Archive.is is definitely not an alternative that people should use in this situation

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Nor archive.ph, which appears to be the same site? Idk how that works. Definitely not a site anyone should go to, though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 minutes ago

Nor archive.md nor archive.today, which appear to be run by the same rogue actors and serve the same content as archive.is and archive.ph. Beware.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 hours ago

"Append...before", AKA "prepend"!

[–] [email protected] 62 points 9 hours ago (10 children)

Definitely don't use uBlock Origin's zapper mode to get rid of elements on the page that are blocking your view.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 54 minutes ago

Then you just get an unblocked half an article

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

On mobile Firefox, two right swipes in the middle of the screen closes zapper mode. It is not clear or obvious, but it works.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 hours ago

I have been using inspect element to manually remove ads and other annoying things

Thanks for reminding me!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 hours ago

^ This person adblocks

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 9 hours ago

Back during prohibition in the US, there was a product called Vine-Glo that was a brick of grape concentrate. It came with a warning: "After dissolving the brick in a gallon of water, do not place the liquid in a jug away in the cupboard for twenty days, because then it would turn into wine."

[–] [email protected] 48 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

And God forbid if someone uses archiving sites like archive.is!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 hours ago

Archive.ph >12ft.io

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί