top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 51 points 2 years ago (19 children)

oh great, commercial eugenics

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • load more comments (18 replies)
    [–] 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    That's not how IQ works you idiots.

    Wait. Who's the idiots? The ones selling the service, the ones falling for the service, or the embryos that they decide to have low IQ?

    I'd say the first two, and if the parents are responsible for the education of the kid, all three.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago* (5 children)

    Re one, what is worse? People selling anti wifi amulets that they know don't work? Or people who sell them while not understanding (nor believing) that they dont work? (More likely it doesnt matter as it remains a scam. Ow god, im getting close to doing actual ethical thinking here).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 27 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    "Given these three steps, what's the logical fourth one?"
    "..."
    "God this embryo is an idiot."

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Good luck having an embryo pass an iq test. Most of them can't even read.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 24 points 2 years ago* (16 children)

    The thing with IVF is that it's already incredibly weirdly eugenicist.

    Like, read some of the parameters they'd screen you for if you wanted to donate sperm. You get bonus points for having a PhD? I'm sorry? You're looking for a better-educated sperm?

    And when you apply for IVF and choose a donor you get their education and job. "I want my cum to be a pilot!" The fuck.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • load more comments (15 replies)
    [–] 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I didn't understand how the hell the "pro-life" crowd would cheer for IVF since it entails destroying plenty of embryos. Now I understand: it's the opportunity for some good old fashioned eugenics.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    IQ is so incredibly complicated, and we really don't know how it works, and what genes allow for the possibility of high IQ. So what are they even screening for? If they're just looking at broad trends in population IQ compared to genetics, then what they're actually seeing are environmental factors, which play an immense role in whether or not potential is ever reached.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • But on the plus side, the people capable of paying for this bullshit are going to have significantly higher chance of proper nutrition for their kids, access to good education, and ability to avoid environmental toxins, so they just have to compare their "handpicked sperm" to the population as a whole and they'll show great results.

    Yeah this is an obvious scam lol.

    (It's not about IQ specifically, but to anyone interested in how many different environment factors play a role in human behavior/outcomes, Behave by Robert Sapolsky is an excellent overview of research in a broad variety of fields. It's definitely not a light read, but it doesn't assume too much prior knowledge, and is one of my favorite books on what makes us tick.)

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I would definitely hate to be burdened with an IQ. Such a terrible thing to be born with

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Gross, but I'm not shocked. IVF and prenatal genetics screening is big business, it was really only a matter of time until someone tried pulling this. As much as it shouldn't be the case, the 'line must go up' edict holds in the medical business too. I know some large lab services companies that are likely watching groups like this with great interest (but letting them take the risks first, which is smart because this is a con).

    My hope is that someone squashes this and we keep screening limited to risks for severe developmental disorders (which, even still, is at least a little ethically problematic) and conditions that lower the probability of the pregnancy coming to term. But we'll see - there's gold in dem der embryos.

    Edit: Read the original investigative article. Modern Nazis are reportedly involved. Again, gross, but not shocked. https://investigations.hopenothate.org.uk/superbaby-factory/

    Would love to see further independent verification from a non-activism-focused source (to be clear, I am not saying the investigators are being irresponsible in their reporting), but the way newsroom budgets have been slashed these days, it's really only outlets like this doing actual, old school investigative work.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    GATTICA! GATTICA! GATTICA!

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    If I only have about fifty embryos, can I pay $50k to have them scanned now and have another 50 embryo scans left on my account or do I have to have all of them on hand immediately?

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    training your sperm to pass raven's progressive matrices

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    I actually read a Red Dwarf fanfic about this once where Rimmer's parents had paid for embryo selection to make sure all their kids had high IQs and good genes because they wanted to make sure they all got into the Space Corps

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›