this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
744 points (91.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9742 readers
125 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"It's not like the government is forcing you to buy a car!"

If you live in a city with parking minimums, yes they fucking are.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I hate car dependence too but when I see things like this I wonder what your solution is for people like me who can't really walk much.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

uhh, mobility scooters and wheelchairs? i'm a bit confused as to how this isn't really easy to answer

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Would it work for you to drive to a larger parking garage (or even better, use public transport to a larger subway or bus station) and then use some form of battery operated micro-transport type vehicle fit for your type of limitation to move around the sidewalks/bike lanes in what can then be a more compact city center?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

What would your solution for a blind peron be in this car dependant world? Having multiple transportation options is the most fair system. Right now in many places the car is the only option.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Having big parking lots for people to walk across has the same problem. If you can't walk far it's better to have density so you don't have to walk as far.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Handicap parking spots already solve that problem though

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not everyone who can't really walk much qualify for handicapped status. The majority don't. The elderly as just one example.

Additionally, on-street parking gets you even closer to where you want to go. In fact, if more people who can walk did walk, it would make it even easier for people who can't who won't have as much competition for good parking spots.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

I don't see any comment asking to remove all cars from the roads. Only that viable alternatives to driving be made possible by sensible zoning instead of building everything solely to cater to cars.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Would accessibility be a solution here? I am speaking about public transport that has dedicated spaces for wheelchairs, has ramps to get on and off etc., as well as sidewalks that are accesibil by wheelchairs, with a smith surface and ramps to get on and off to. Maybe combine that with lifts to access pedestrian subways and overbrides.

Possibly it could also mean the ability to rent, best case for free and at a place reachable by public transport with very little or no walking, a wheelchair or a simiiular solution that let's one drive rather then walk.

I'm just thinking loud, but maybe such solutions should be considered in every walkable city.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 days ago (11 children)

I was reading about a study that showed how much the climate temperature would rise if every house had solar panels on their roof. I then immediately thought, hey now, what if we had less asphalt everywhere, would that not affect overall temperatures as well?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 2 days ago (24 children)

As a European, this is the first time I ever heard about parking minimums. What a horrible concept.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 days ago (8 children)

From Germany: huh? Quite common around here and I am sure in other european countries as well, despite having different city building concepts than the US. Lately it is slowly being replaced by bike infrastructure demands (and there was always the public transport demands), but it still exists.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] [email protected] 140 points 3 days ago (1 children)

One of the funniest things about American car culture is that Americans probably walk the same distance from their parking spot to the store as I walk from my home.

[–] [email protected] 90 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

And they're walking in car infrastructure. Some of the most unpleasant, not made for humans places, not to mention dangerous. Compared to walking in what a city should feel like.

[–] [email protected] 120 points 3 days ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The horrible AI slop looks so bad if you look at it for longer than a second. Do better yall.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Thing is: you don't need to look at it longer than a second to understand what is meant to be conveyed. So no, goal achieved, good use of resources instead of overspending on one useless metric (=making it realistic)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It's not just oppression against "other forms of transport;" it's literally classist and (to the extent that race corresponds to class, which is a lot and on purpose) racist. A lot of these zoning laws about minimum parking requirements and minimum lot sizes date back to a time when United States government policy was explicitly designed to perpetuate segregation, and forcing every new parcel and development to be large and expensive enough to be unaffordable to most black people (because they were, and still are, poorer on average because of other institutional racism) was a part of that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›