651
Against Lemmy Karma (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

There is already a total count of up- and downvotes, but please never add karma to Lemmy. We don't want to deal with karma farmers and minimal karma requirements to post. I don't care about the moderation issues because karma brought more harm than good. Please never add that bloody dreadful thing to Lemmy. I already saw a bunch of people supporting adding karma to Lemmy, which will turn Lemmy into a cheap Reddit clone and karma-farming hell. Please, never add karma to Lemmy. I beg you. No more karma hell.

(page 2) 42 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

I was actually about to make a post about this, addressing this issue, but more glad this is already up.

I'm not a fan of any karma system, regardless of platform. People really tie themselves to reactions, likes, upvotes, downvotes .etc to where it cripples them. Nothing they say or do becomes authentic and natural anymore. They say or do things for the specific purpose to get something to validate what they're saying or doing.

And it creates this frustrating system where we end up having to deal with farmers. Reddit is ingrained with it, because we've seen it one too many times. People reposting junk, they get thousands of upvotes and they aren't held accountable for it. We've also seen people perform downvote brigades, hence coining the term 'downvoted to oblivion'. Where, people proactively downvote every post and comment someone has made because of some spite and out of emotion in regards to an opinion that was said.

And they know the effects of these things, because we tie ourselves way too much into it. I'd like to not see scoring or karma systems everywhere. They do nothing but encourage the worst out of anyone to exploit them. They're meaningless, it's just an internet toy that people play with when so many platforms try so hard to describe their importance. But in the end, it's just a stupid internet toy that serves NO purpose.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

While I agree with most points I'd like to give a reason why a voting system can be a good idea. It is a way to filter interest or engagement, posts or comments that got a reaction are likely more interesting to other users as well. And another argument is that it gives perceived value to an account, meaning people will not spamm accounts and banning someone has a perceived consequence. I don't moderate any community so I don't know if that is effective but I feel like thats a reason for keeping a version of that around

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Say "No!" to the karma ho.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Karma! We won't farm ya!

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I agree. The less flair, the better, imo. Ideally, I would like it to stay as it is now, where your username and avatar are the only reputational markers, and upvotes and downvotes are only officially tracked on a per post basis. If you want to increase your reputation, then put out quality posts that make people remember your username.

Any other additional flair/reputation trackers besides that incentivise low effort posts. Those posts are entertaining, don't get me wrong, but it would be nice to see how lemmy evolves without directly incentivising them.

Edit: wording

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Karma sucks, i nuked my reddit accounts every 6 months to stop myself getting hooked on it

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago
[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I don’t know why we have Karma system, people can just buy an account if they’re banned or such. The system that Digg had was never build to locked people out, it was to make things popular.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Buying an account is more effort than making one, so fewer banned users will bother with it.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I like karma - gamification is fun, humans like watching number go up

I think the answer is to localize it. Maybe community/server based, maybe make it bleed off with time, maybe do all of these and use statistics to come up with a way to make the metric useful somehow

What we don't need is karma done badly, and there's a lot of far more important things to worry about first - I think we should put it way on the back burner and wait for an elegant proposal for how to handle it

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I've mentioned it in a another post but I don't want any visible points at all. I think the counts for upvotes, downvotes, etc should all be hidden.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Can someone explain how Jerboa up/downvotes aren't karma? I don't quite understand how karma isn't already a thing here.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

The Reddthat instance that I'm on also has disabled down voting which I'm also all for. On Reddit, down voting very often became a tool for vocalizing what you disagreed with rather than a low effort or inappropriate post.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

I am MAJORLY against disabling downvoting. This results in VERY toxic comments and content being pushed to the front and click bating content, which is what was witnessed on YouTube and Facebook, and is still a major problem. This is because youtube and other sites measure popularity of content not just by upvotes but by interaction. If you click on and/or comment on something, that's interaction. Youtube does not care about the quality of content and comments, so long as it is interacted with and shared. This means that inflammatory comments and content and click bate get lots of angry comments and rage clicks and click bait gets clicked because it's click bait and it registers and popular content that will generate lots of interaction so it gets pushed to the forefront. On reddit this kind of content gets largely weeded out by a quality check, downvotes. While no system is perfect, this allows the community to say "no, ok, just because I clicked on this and maybe even left a comment, this is NOT good content, and should not be shared with others." It also is a natural scam and spam filter that allows the community to quickly shoot down anything that is obviously spam.

Youtube comments were extremely toxic for this exact reason for a long time after the change. They had to implement a lot of changes to help reduce that toxicity, and probably went back to considering the downvotes despite not showing the count.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I agree with you from the context of YouTube, and perhaps I am misinderstanding Lemmy, but I don't think it has any sort of similar engagement mechanism?

The issue with YouTube is the desire to push "engaging" content even if that content sucks or is actively incendiary.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
651 points (95.4% liked)

General Discussion

13031 readers
3 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


🪆 About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: [email protected]!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


💬 Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules and Policies

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to [email protected] or [email protected] communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS