this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
47 points (92.7% liked)

Gaming

2518 readers
178 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

What's the point? It's not like the people who still put money into this scam are going to be turned off by yet more undelivered promises.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Sounds like a great two weeks to spend talking to recruiters and interviewing.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Unfortunately par for the course in game development.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah but leave it to journos to never miss a chance to shit on star citizen for clicks. I seriously doubt they actually care.

Half the time I make the mistake of giving them a click it's lazy unresearched shit... CIG has a lot of problems for sure, but "the media" loves to profit off of SC bashing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Seems fine. They're providing food, overtime pay, and pto for use at a future date. That's a better deal than a lot of employees get. Obviously this isn't how I think we should do work/living, but that's about as fair of a compromise as you're going to see in this particular industry at this time unless you're extremely lucky.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Who okayed this article? It's just a signal boost of the Inside Gaming article with nothing new added besides anti-Cloud Imperium fluff. Also, they actually misrepresent the lieu time given, conflating the Citizencon lieu time for the Squadron 42 lieu time that has a restriction on when it can be used. As far as the original article goes, there aren't any know restrictions on the former.