this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
32 points (72.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

29612 readers
1091 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics (NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out)
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
32
If we were created then the creators probably put fail safes so we can't see our own code. (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Was thinking about this in terms of AI. As we create it we are probably going to put fail safes on it. So it would be reasonable then to assume if we were created the same thing would be programmed in us.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But we can that's what DNA is and we are learning how to rewrite it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's true, I wonder where consciousnesses falls into that?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

C.S. Lewis once said you are a soul, you have a body.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

now we need to protest against god to open source humans or make a libre alternative

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hard to say. It depends on what kind of programs/robots we were. It might be that certain percentage of us are our creaters, it might be that we got rid of our creators, it might be that there's only one creator...

Too many possibilities.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Does not compute error error error cheezoid hates self

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Nah, they'd allow self modifying code to see what we do with it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

And you think they did it correctly? Every large SW project has bugs. I assume this one would as well.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But we might be able to reverse engineer it. Isn't that what we are doing, kinda?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

If only they left an instruction manual