this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
188 points (99.5% liked)

Physics

1297 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So it's galaxies all the way down?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And all the way up!

There are organisms for whom our galaxies are seen as cells.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Brb, nuking account, destroying phone and burning my clothing.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago

This is just really neat. Keep up the good work, scientists!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

One step closer to teleporters

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Screw teleporters, I want replicators

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Real monkey paw here...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Aww, that guy's kinda cute, why wouldn't I want to let it live in my house with its pals?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I’ve been watching SG1 for the first time and recently watched this episode. Buckets of fun!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

All of the above and holodecks please

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, I suppose replicators are an inevitable punctuated step on the way.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is there much difference between the two logistically? Seems like the replicator is just the second half of a transporter.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Well there's an episode in ds9 where a replicator is modified into a teleporter, so in the star trek universe they're very similar. Replicators reconstitute matter from waste material, and seems to me to be far more likely in the realm of scientific possibility.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

It's incredible that we can actually 'see' the atomic lattice and it's also pretty wicked that the oxygen atom is more 'fuzzy' because, I think given the explanation on how they imaged this, it's less dense than praseodymium and scandium.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

how do they achieve higher resolutions than with former electron microscopes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They use a technique called ptychography. They explain it a bit more in the article.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

The way they describe it in the article is how I understand a electron microscope works

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

interferometry

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago