this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
13 points (100.0% liked)

Formula 1

9048 readers
173 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


Rules


  1. Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

Up next


F1 Calendar

2024 Calendar

Location Date
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States 21-23 Nov
πŸ‡ΆπŸ‡¦ Qatar 29 Nov-01 Dec
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ͺ Abu Dhabi 06-08 Dec

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi all, maybe I missed something but wouldn't splitting the strategy have been the first choice for mclaren? Given that Norris was taking time to catch up and overtake on new hards, why would you want to pit the lead driver?

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I think Lewis' analysis was spot on.

He said that McLaren pushed way too hard too early on (didn't Piastri set like 5 fastest laps in the middle of the GP?).

When Bono was relaying lap time information of the cars ahead to him he thought "there's no way the McLaren's tyres will last, they've forced themselves into a 2 stop strategy", which did indeed turn out to be the case, and it opened the door to Ferrari doing the 1 stop.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Good point, thanks!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They asked Piastri during the race about that, he replied that his front left was in a pretty bad shape. So I guess they concluded that they would lose more by staying.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

IIRC in the post race interview he mentioned that he had bad graining on the front left wheel and they he didn’t think the tires would hold up. Both McClaren cars seemed to have more problems with that than the rest of the field

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If he hadn't pitted but Lando did, highly likely Lando catches and overtakes him. Also, there is a good chance that Charles would have pitted a second time then overtook him as well. The tyre delta for both mclarens at the end to charles was huge, and the ferrari was kinder to its tyres than the mclaren.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

From the team's perspective, Lando overtaking him would be beneficial, right, since it would be a 1-2? If Charles pits, yeah, it makes sense to respond, just no need to do it before that since mclaren has a faster car. But yeah, if ferrari was much kinder to tyres, I see the point..