Science Memes

10842 readers

2714 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

357

The Three Kinds of Scientific Research (mander.xyz)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 months ago

The secret fourth kind is 'we applied a standard theory to their map of every tree and got some suspicious results.'

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You can't have 1st and 2nd without the 3rd kind

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I think the comic is about types of published articles with the 3rd being "we collated and collected a bunch of data to make this database that other researchers will find useful"-type papers. So you don't need to rely on the map of every tree if you just map some trees yourself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why though?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How do you make theories without observation?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

#3 is not about making observations in general but about making a map of every tree. This is a common mistake of scientists, wanting to have a complete set of data on their topic. I myself have to remind myself of this as well when designing projects. But in reality you cannot make a map of every tree and even if you could, what's it worth? You need abstractions to understand anything and models are just that. To design a good research study you need to balance how many observations are necessary vs how much effort they take.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I feel like it's just useful for different use cases. You don't need to start with making a map of all trees everytime but it certainly would be handy if someone else had compiled a map of all / most trees for reference.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It just isn't feasible. But maybe this is my ecological background speaking. Because, sure, if I'd look at different branches of science, it might be doable and also useful. But if you look at ecology (and making a map of every tree is ecology) then this just isn't useful enough for a task that is basically impossible to achieve. That's why in ecological research there are some standard sampling methods, like plots, transects, etc. Within these, you could do a map of all the trees if necessary. But these will be only a fraction of the whole system you look at.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

We have made some amazing discoveries with full-sky maps and analysis of the CMB. The human genome project has also yeilded a wealth of discoveries.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I like the way it kinda works regardless of if the punchline is about biological or computer science trees

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Don't forget ethnographers and the surname Tree

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The map from the third is the "circumstances" of the first two. Or the "results". First two just theorists, I guess.