this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
-46 points (18.1% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4347 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Despite any initial reservations about Harris’ ability to lead,

He did pick her for veep, so it'd be weird if this was true.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He also campaigned on being a 1 term president

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Isn't it funny how surprised he is that he kept that promise?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Isn't it admirable that he strung trump along, baiting out all the most ageist shit the magasphere could possibly generate only to drop out after the rnc convention, forcing tired dumb trump to throw out 6 years of campaign stumping?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

He's been extremely competent, of course. I think history will treat him more kindly than we have.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago

The media is pulling out ALL the stops to turn the DNC into a drama-filled fiasco, but Dems aren't going to let it happen.

Call me when he goes on a nine fucking year grievance tour.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

The article headline makes you think it's a quote from biden. The article makes you think it's a quote from his friend. Follow it to axios, and you find that it's their own interpretation, and still should be left in context.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

This might rub some folks the wrong way, but I have zero sympathy for him. Even if he feels betrayed, which is kind of understandable, that’s politics man, and sometimes it’s rough. Especially when the candidate can’t string together a coherent sentence.

But since he’s been in positions with significant power for longer than most of us have been alive, you’d think he would have understood that about his chosen career by now? In presidential politics, the only thing that matters is winning, and he wasn’t going to win.

Assuming he truly understands the stakes of the election, this was the most politically savvy decision he could have possibly made, so frankly it’s time to suck it up and enjoy the showers of love and praise he’s getting, and spend that government pension on some awesome vacations. Goodbye, and thank you for your service. Please lay off the whining, it’s not a great look.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/19/biden-dnc-speech-harris I read the article and the linked axios article, and I'm still not sure there was any value to them. Maybe he is still pissed, and he's talking about it with his pals, but if he doesn't do anything with them, he's entitled to feel what he wants. He laughed when he heard a friend defended him. Cool!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I thought he'd understood why it was better for him to drop out of the race, but I guess that was overly optimistic of me

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

He can understand, but still be pissed the work he put in during this administration wasn't able to carry him to a second term after being undermined by his age and debate performance. Especially considering the alternative

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If the change hadn't been made, he'd be polling third behind RFKjr.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

I mean that's kind of crazy hyperbole... RFK Jr, is still a crazy who only appeals to a tiny portion of people. Biden would continue to lose ground to trump, but I imagine he'd have probably held the popular vote, but remain losing in all the states that matter for the election.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You can admit it, you're in a safe space here.

You spent a long time going over everything that man did and said so it's okay to feel some grief now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Glad he's out

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 months ago

Daily Beast - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Daily Beast:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.thedailybeast.com/joe-biden-still-stunned-and-pissed-ahead-of-his-dnc-speech
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support