Marx claimed capitalism was crucial for production: China skipped their capitalism phase, so that's why they re-introduced it with Dengist reforms. Is this statement too reductive? (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 3 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

1 comments fedilink hide all child comments

u/jmattchew - originally from r/GenZhou
Question is in the title. I know that everything is more complicated than this, but is it a fair shorthand assessment or not? Could it be too simple to say that feudalism -> capitalism -> socialism, or is this actually the right way to look at it? Did the USSR fail because it went straight from feudalism to socialism and then introduced the wrong reforms?

top 1 comments

sorted by: hot top new old

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 years ago

u/orkgashmo - originally from r/GenZhou
They didn't re-introduced capitalism, they adapted their socialism to the global market.

this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2022

0 points (NaN% liked)

GenZhouArchive

233 readers

1 users here now

A space to archive anything from /r/GenZhou

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]