834
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Why is it so hard for a company to be like... oh shit, our bad, we won't use this! Nah. Gotta make the poisoning legal.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

Nothing to see here move along

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

how sweet of them

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

(chemical in consumer product) is made of SCIENCE therefore it is OBJECTIVELY GOOD and if you have issues with that chemical you must be a TREE HUGGING CRYSTAL HEALING HIPPIE! very-intelligent

Heard that sort of shit about glyphosate too, especially on reddit-logo

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago

No matter what they say, i'll assume aspartamine is poison and refuse to eat anything that has it.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I think the same thing about everything! Never believe anything that doesn't align with my personal beliefs no matter how much evidence exists to the contrary!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
834 points (96.2% liked)

World News

36911 readers
571 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS