834
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

From the start I've never drunk all these Zero drinks because after reading a little about just how poisonous aspartame is, it was obvious this stuff shouldn't be consumed.

I'd rather drink sugar sugar than aspartame. Having said that I've just stopped drinking all of these sweet drinks all together.

I hope the truth gets out to the public

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

Same, I don't think it's a good habit to regularly drink sugary drinks even if they have "fake" sugar in them. It's just these companies finding ways for us to consume more of their product without the guilt of calories.

When I'm thirsty I drink water. And very rarely will I drink something else with real sugar like juice, a beer, or even rarer an actual soda.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

There's no evidence of aspartame being harmful to humans and there's been a shit ton of research on it from various people

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

In the end, the aspartame in the coke Zero is likely less harmful than the sugar, and I would pick a coke Zero every day of the week over coke with sugar.

Sugar is just not healthy.

load more comments (22 replies)
[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Would this fall under the purvey of regulatory capture?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Regulatory bodies tend to act purely as pipelines getting people jobs in the industry they are supposed to be regulating.

Profits before people, as always.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
834 points (96.2% liked)

World News

36754 readers
403 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS