all 46 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 130 points 2 years ago (6 children)

On Sunday, Musk also tweeted out a video of Harris saying her pronouns and describing her appearance for accessibility and captioned the post, “Imagine 4 years of this…”

woke derangement is so hilarious. the vast majority of people don't gaf about this, and their insistence on pointing it out is so alienating.

look at this person being considerate!? anyone else hate considering others!?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 74 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    yeah she was literally in a room with blind people and disability leaders in that clip. not surprised the most basic anti-ableism bothers him, tesla's been known to violate the ADA

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    I was making small talk about work at a kid’s party recently, and the guy asked me “Is woke ever a problem at your job?”

    I responded like a person who is pretending to know what something means: “My job is pretty straightforward, etc.”

    It’s dumbfounding to me that there are people talking about this stuff in real life. At kids’ birthday parties!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 90 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Oh my God! Soviet Democratic People's Republic of China much?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 78 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Russia this, Russia that, calls coming from inside the house

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    I've seen libs unironically claim that Musk is a Russian asset because he said Ukraine should surrender (I believe because some of his businesses rely on goods and services from Russia so he's hoping for the war to be wrapped up and sanctions to be lifted) so I look forward to hearing waaaaay more of that in the foreseeable future.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 73 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Yet she continues to post there. Along with every other dumb ass politician

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 72 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [–] 69 points 2 years ago

    Twotter can do whatever they want coz they're a corporation

    ancap-good

  • source
  • [–] 67 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Between this and him making it so people can't block Trump hashtags I'm starting to think this Elon guy might have not been totally honest about not picking a side.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 57 points 2 years ago

    And it doesn't even matter to him. Neither person being president would do anything to his wealth or influence. He's just very divorced and his kids hate him.

    Nationwide political movement of shitty dads whose trans kids don't talk to them anymore

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 65 points 2 years ago

    I guess her ideas aren't very competitive in the free market???

  • source
  • [–] 63 points 2 years ago

    Freedom and free market, they say

  • source
  • [–] 62 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Seize all social media and Amazon, and nationalize it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    seize all private property and socialize it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 62 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Imagine the US government starting a Mastodon instance

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I would be genuinely surprised if there wasn't a server with three-letter-agency backing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    infosec dot exchange. they gleefully welcomed feds on there

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    What the context for this? I'm on infosec.town on an alt profile because of the tech people on it lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    i know at one point they were quite proud to have a federal (DHS i think?) cybersecurity department on there. like, there was an announcement. this was a couple years ago, so i guess stuff may have changed since then, but i don't trust like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    What are the chances that the infrastructure propping up Twitter is so degraded that it couldn't handle such a massive influx of new follows to a single account?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago

    Conservatives big mad...

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (5 children)
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I hope so, I love crime, as an illegalist, I fully support breaking laws, what law is being broken?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I'm not 100% seeing how I don't really care much for the laws in a dog shit hellhole founded on genocide and slavery, but I'm pretty sure it's a 1st amendment violation bc of how official twitter accounts for members of the government are considered protected speech.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The first amendment binds the government, not the public. I believe the context you're referring to only applies to official social media accounts blocking US citizens

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago
    [–] 17 points 2 years ago

    Almost like “serious” people should stop giving legitimacy to what is effectively stormfront?

    But capital doesn’t care and that’s why the press as well as other institutions have followed right along

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    Stop.

    Using.

    Twitter.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    The market has spoken smuglord

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    So much freedom of speech

  • source