51
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

imagine being this butthurt

[-] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

Cool, it's like any one of the thousands of rightoid whines about wikipedia and then it somehow devolves into even more boring nonsense which I'm not going to read especially since most of it was probably written by an LLM.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

Without fail in the comments section, we have Daniel Kokotajlo (the philosophy student turned ai safety advocate who recently got canned at OAI) making the claim that "we [ = Young Daniel and our olde friend Big Yud] are AI experts and believe that risking full scale nuclear war over data centers is actually highly rational^{tm}" :)

...anyways, what were we saying about David Gerard being a bad faith actor again?

[-] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

The comments are quite a selection of typical things. 'harassing innocent IQ researchers' 'the sneerclubbers are all losers who hate crypto' etc etc. Hitting the familiar beats.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

Well that's a lot of words. It's like someone turned a dispute over editing a page into an biography of the editor. It's that kind if mountain out of a molehill business that has led to me no longer editing Wikipedia.

And the bit if the article that struck home:

He had started out on the internet 20 years before as a passionate partisan for his new tribe and its potential to transform the world. In the intervening decades, though, his optimism had waned.

It's not an uncommon trajectory, it's one I've been on myself, becoming disillusioned by social media. And yet, the Fediverse has given me new hope and enthusiasm.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Trace started his research on the site for banned Wikipedia cranks. I don't know if he can presently edit Wikipedia, but he writes like someone who can't.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago

It definitely reads like a frustrated editor dramatising petty disputes for a wider audience, who I very much doubt is interested in Wikipedia minutiae. It doesn't explain why it has to be quite that long - I managed to finish reading it but it took a few goes to slog my way to the finish.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago
[-] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

I have never edited the LessWrong article, not sure what you're talking about.

receipts posted

I meant I have never disruptively edited the article. (...) I'm not a power user of Wikipedia and don't understand all your specialist terminology

Dude physically unable to take an L.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
51 points (98.1% liked)

SneerClub

1099 readers
17 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

See our twin at Reddit

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS