this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
1707 points (98.2% liked)

People Twitter

5268 readers
792 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Hold my fuckin beer friends i remember when tunguska was a 'weird alien thing' and when Ballard found Titanic

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I didnt graduate highschool though. Quit at 16 to go to work full time got my ged at 29

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

An even better idea: make your OWN list! Don't expect someone else to tell you the truth if you're not working to search for it yourself!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Curious how you would go about this process of creating a list of your own knowledge that is outdated.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's kind of a fun idea, but as everyone has pointed out: every school is different, even of there is some centralized board of education, some times teachers just say dumb shit.

Also, when does a fact become a fact? Like, dinosaurs had feathers. It was theorized, then debated, then clarified, and now there are some reasonable consensus about it, but theropauds probably still aren't presented as having feathers in some books. And what teachers know this?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Or you get common misconceptions that were never facts. Like you only use 10% of your brain. I don't think science ever said that, but man the idea is/was really common.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

There are also plenty of things in science that are taught that are technically incorrect, but give you a working model that you can build on later. The atomic model being a rather typical example.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

That's fair: abstraction. The technical wrongness of "orbiting electrons" as in the whichever-model serves a purpose: the truth is hairy, and more importantly not practically relevant if you're calculating sliding boxes around planes and that sort of thing.

On the other hand, "10% of the brain" and similar nuggets of common "wisdom" are just flat-out wrong, often stupidly so. There's very little use in that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh. Yeah. That's a good point. When I taught a dead language, I would tell my students that all grammars lie to you, but some of the lies are useful.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The Wittgensteinian Ladder. The pedagogical expedient misinformation.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›