Despite how hot it is, landlords in Tennessee are not required to keep the air conditioning running.

In our changing climate, that probably comes as a surprise.

However, unless it's in the lease, nothing in Tennessee's Landlord-Tenant Act gives renters the right to air conditioning.

"I think it's unfair. It's inhumane to me because without air we can't live and breathe," said Anita Brown.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 75 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (35 children)

i think it is disingenuous to represent that AC is a standard or required by law for a rental anywhere, at least in the US. I do find it shitty that the AC included with the unit is damaged, and land(slum)lord won't fix it, but again, unless it's in the lease there really is no requirement that the LL provide it in US. I think it is good to start a discussion on if AC for a rental should be the law, (edit: i also would strongly support this) but i doubt we will see that become the case, especially in southern states which probably would need it most.

  • source
  • hideshow 35 child comments
  • [–] 108 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    i think it is disingenuous to represent that AC is a standard or required by law for a rental anywhere, at least in the US.

    Having AC is a standard and required by law in many places in the US

    https://www.rent.com/blog/keeping-cool-tenant-landlord-responsibilities-air-conditioning/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 62 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    that didn't have any list of states, but my curiosity lead me here https://propertyclub.nyc/article/apartment-air-conditioning-laws#what-states-require-air-conditioning

    i was pleasantly surprised to find 24 states that do require it, with some other states that have some loopholes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago

    I tried to find the list but brain failed me and i kept getting bar association stuff. Did you know that while Missouri doesn't require AC it does require that units be kept to a 'habitable' temperature, and there's enormous case law defining that word that makes it defacto required but technically not.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    If the building becomes unlivable it’s an issue. high temps with high humidity can literally lead to heat stroke since no amount of fans will help since you literally can’t cool off even with sweating.

    What that fix is, I’m not sure, but some buildings in areas of the south become ovens during heat waves and without AC people will get sick or die.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    We also don’t technically require that you have a steady supply of oxygen in your apartment, but I’m guessing you’d find it unreasonable if you woke up in a vacuum.

    Do we even have a law that says landlords can’t heat your apartment to 100 degrees Fahrenheit? Or a law that specifically proscribes noise machines? Do we really have to specify every fucking thing or can people just be reasonable?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    It's just fucked up that an appliance that's connected to the actual rental unit doesn't need to be operational by law. I mean, if the 'fridge dies in a TN rental unit is the landlord required to fix it or does that need to be specified in the lease also?

    It's just basic consumer protection, IMO. The AC comes with the apartment, the landlord should be required to maintain it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    I’d argue that if it’s a feature of the unit that was present when someone signed, then yes it should be required to work.

    Of course contracts can’t cover every little thing, so it’s ridiculous to rely on them for that level of granularity. Do we need to mandate contracts have an Entry for every feature of every appliance, every piece of infrastructure, every piece of structure? No. These things were presented as being there and functioning. But we should be able to rely on things working as presented. We should have a legal right that that be true

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Central Air absolutely needs to be a requirement on all new construction. And window units need to be mandatory unless requested otherwise in every bed room.

    It's way too hot these days in the car majority of the US for this to be safe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (18 replies)
    [–] 67 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I actually agree that nobody has a “right to air conditioning”.

    But people do have a right to whatever’s been promised in a contract they signed.

    This lady rented an apartment with an air conditioner. She’s paying for this apartment. The landlord isn’t allowed to just ignore requests for maintenance because they don’t feel like providing the air conditioner any more.

    The air conditioner is part of the deal they agreed to, and the landlord isn’t holding up their end of the deal.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 40 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    I had jury duty once and the air conditioning was acting up. Judge announced we would all be moving to a different room as a result, which we did.

    Guess it isn't a luxury when it's a judge's place of work.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    It's very much a selective thing. Humans vs meat machines.

    I'm a meat machine. The factory I work in regularly gets over 90°F in the summer and being on long Island its also humid as fuck like 75%+.

    I checked the NY state laws on factory conditions and wouldn't you know it, the fucking laws are vague as shit to allow essentially anything... "All factories must maintain a reasonable temperature and humidity." That's the fucking law. "Reasonable" is not defined anywhere in that law... I contacted my business cuck "R"epresentative about what that law means or how we determine what is reasonable, and yet again wouldn't you know, he never responded...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 39 points 2 years ago* (13 children)

    people used to build houses that were designed in such a way where you didn't need air conditioning. In tropical country such as Vietnam where I live this is still the case. I have to wonder if the United States builds houses inefficiently on purpose.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I think we got lazy with our designs once centralized air was mainstreamed. The house my father grew up in the 1950s was designed like you mentioned. It would only allow light through during certain times of year/day with its overhanges and louvers and it jad more windows which allow more air flow....now according to him it was still a miserable place to live during the 1950s Texas summers....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    Sort of. Pretty much all of suburban housing is cookie cutter houses made out of the cheapest possible material available. Really the only improvements we've made is better insulation and standardized 2 way heat pumps.

    I can't imagine apartments and buildings are much better when you can just slap an AC onto anything and call it a day.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [+] 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
    [removed by mod]
  • source
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (20 children)

    We could just start building houses so they don't need them like they do in Hawaii. The well designed houses are designed in a way that allows maximum airflow when the windows are open because the price of running an ac there is astronomical.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    There's a lot more regular breeze in Hawaii

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Ya, you got me there. You can also build them like termites in Africa do with their hives. They build them in a way to vent heat, and so they catch the minimum amount of light and heat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    If you've ever been to the deep south usa like Tennessee you would know that's not viable. Temps hit 100 F easily most summers. Humidity is often very high in combination with the scorching heat.

    Fortunately it is definitely NOT the norm for homes to be built and/or rented that do not have AC. I've rented numerous cheap homes and apartments in the South, every one had AC. My cheapest rental home was $300/mo and it had all utilities (and central HVAC) working except Internet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    We could just…?

    Maybe we could just limit the temps in other hot areas to the same as Hawaii which gets around 85° and rarely goes over 90°?

    How about other parts or the US where temps regularly exceed 100° or even 110°? Those airflow designs would do little more than pipe summer heat through their homes.

    You can design homes in hot areas to do well, but it’s not an airflow issue. You can do earth berms, thicker walls, much better insulation, and design windows and eaves to prevent the high summer sun from coming in windows to heat the interior. Unfortunately a lot of these kinds of efficient building styles are seen as crunchy-granola and don’t lend themselves to mass produced, cheap material, suburban tract homes and McMansions. The problem is crappy construction and our insistence on the prevalent suburban style.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 18 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I had a friend that was not allowed to run air conditioning in his flat. The landlord said the old wiring could not handle it. I said that all you needed was a decent UPS (they make these just for window units in India), but my friend just moved instead. 100+ F is too hot in a flat during Summer.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I feel like the habitability requirement might be governing on issues of extreme heat.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    In the mean time instead of dying from heat exhaustion do an internet search for DIY AIR CONDITIONING and at least see what your options are. Good luck. Climate change is a thing by the way.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    something in common with prisoners! Hell yeah Tennessee!

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    If this was Phoenix Arizona we wouldn't be having this conversation because all the tenants would already be dead. If there's a danger to tenants the answer seems obvious.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›