this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
18 points (95.0% liked)

Te Wai Pounamu / South Island

247 readers
1 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to the Te Wai Pounamu / South Island community!

A community for Te Wai Pounamu / South Island related conversations.

General rules:

Credit to @[email protected] for the banner photo!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
18
Best-case scenario [model]: 5% [would] survive Milford Sound tsunami (www.rnz.co.nz)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A recent Master's thesis has found a Milford Sound tsunami - triggered by a landslide - may leave no survivors, with as many as 3500 dying if the wave hits during the peak of the tourist season.

The new modelling, which builds on more than a decade of research, shows the best chance of survival relies on people running for higher ground before the shaking stops.

The best-case scenario shows 5.2 percent of people would survive the wave, and in this case the tsunami would have to hit at night, during the winter offseason, when only a few hundred people would be in the area.

Edited title to make it sound less like there was just a tsunami and everyone died.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Scary, yes. But it's funny really in some regards, when you think about our tolerance to risk - I live practically on top of the Alpine Fault yet barely give it a second thought. And we're up in Auckland for the weekend - I was surprised to discover that Rangitoto Island is only 600 years old - 2M+ people living 'on' a barely dormant volcano is kinda terrifying.

I'm sure there's a name for the formal Fallacy that applies here - Acceptable Risk maybe?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Hubris

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, I guess when you size up the risk it may not actually be that high compared to everyday activities. What's the risk of being killed in a car crash vs a volcanic eruption happening on Rangitoto over the course of a lifetime?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I volunteer with LandSAR and one of the things they drill into us is risk vs consequence. Yes, the risk of something may be low, but if the consequences are high then you should seriously consider another option... At least in theory 😂

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

You make a good point. An eruption big enough to kill a lot of people (say, 500k) might only happen once in 10 million years. But if it does happen, the country is pretty fucked.

Lucky for us (or them), we can mitigate against the threat. GeoNet does monitor the Auckland volcanic field for activity, and in theory, we would get advanced notice of an eruption and be able to evacuate people. Hopefully you guys have plenty of space down south because if an eruption big enough to kill 500k people ever happens, it will probably make most of the North Island unlivable for some time.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Alright, well I’ll cross that place off my rental search list.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh thank god, I seriously misinterpreted that headline.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wow, title is from the article but now you mention it, it could easily be interpreted as reporting there was a tsunami and everyone is presumed dead... I have edited it to make it sound less like reporting on a disaster.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Serves me right for not reading the news more regularly ha ha.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Haha I think we can blame the poorly worded title.