A federal judge has blocked the state of Hawaii from enforcing a recently enacted ban on firearms on its prized beaches and in other areas including banks, bars and parks, citing last year's landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling expanding gun rights.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 159 points 3 years ago (43 children)

Apart from the "why do you need it" question, the beach is specifically a place people often leave items that can't be taken in the water unattended. Sure, legislators can write laws about how a gun must not be left unattended and gun nuts can swear up and down about how they would never do that, but they will. No matter how much you think "there's a lot of people around" or "I'll just be in and out" or "I'll watch my stuff from the water", thefts happen, and now a mundane occurrence has turned a supposedly (not really) "safe" and "legal" gun into one of those dangerous "illegal" guns they can't be held responsible for.

We were perfectly happy with our gun laws, and they worked, and now fringe nutcases and a politically captured courts are telling us we can't implement common sense restrictions because the nuts have a panic attack if they're not constantly armed.

  • source
  • hideshow 43 child comments
  • [–] 111 points 3 years ago (24 children)

    the nuts have a panic attack if they're not constantly armed.

    That's the real issue, here. These guys are absolutely fucking terrified 100% of the time. They pack heat in order to feel like something besides a helpless babyman.

    I have never even once felt like I couldn't possibly pick up a head of lettuce and some yogurt from the supermarket without some moral support from a gun. It's just fucking bizarre.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • load more comments (24 replies)
  • load more comments (18 replies)
    [–] 90 points 3 years ago (30 children)

    What happened to respecting states rights? So sick of the judicial branch in the US, the most untethered and corrupt branch of them all. Which is saying a lot considering the state of the legislative branch.

  • source
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago

    Republicans want all power consolidated at the level they can most effectively control. They were only ever about "states' rights" because they typically are better at capturing state governments than national institutions.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (26 replies)
    [–] 74 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    How big of a coward do you have to be to feel the need to bring a gun to the beach?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 56 points 3 years ago

    Can I carry one into the court where the justices meet? Or is safety just something the "little people" need to work about?

  • source
  • [–] 40 points 3 years ago (39 children)

    Another awful law 6 years in the making, all thanks to people being too lazy to go out and vote.

    We are going to be feeling the repercussions of that laziness for decades to come.

    In today's world, we can still see the results of Reaganomics and the terrible Reagan administration and what it did to this country some 4 decades later. Allowing Trump to enter the White House 6 years ago has, and will, continue to have a similar profound negative effect on the trajectory of this country for a long, long time.

    You guys sure showed us!

  • source
  • hideshow 39 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 3 years ago (36 children)

    Lazy?

    Have you forgotten about the gerrymandering and voter suppression that's been going on?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 36 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 years ago (25 children)

    This is a result of a SCOTUS decision. SCOTUS membership is determined by the president and control of the senate at the time of vacancies. Neither of those are influenced by gerrymandering.

    At the core of it this comes down to 2016 when a larger than typical number of people on the left lied to themselves and said "eh, they're all teh same" and tossed their vote at a third party or just didn't vote at all. Following that, SCOTUS went from a 4-4 tie (with 1 vacancy) to 6-3 conservative advantange.

    I wouldn't blame laziness, but instead a combination of apathy and people who are more interested in ideological purity than in accepting the available-better such that they would rather complain about the unavailable-best.

    RBG refusing to retire in 2012-2014 also shares blame. She could have retired then and the court would be 5-4 instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • load more comments (25 replies)
  • load more comments (10 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 37 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Why do they defend so hard for like the one weird out of 1000 who openly waves a gun around that makes everyone extremely uncomfortable. People around open carriers don't think "wow freedom!", they get super fucking uncomfortable.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 32 points 3 years ago (27 children)

    Why the fuck does anyone need a gun on the beach? I can’t think of one justifiable argument for needing one there.

  • source
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • load more comments (16 replies)
    [–] 31 points 3 years ago

    Damn, the US annexation of Hawai'i continues to hurt their nation :-(

    I hope one day they can win their freedom back.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    If they can't ban guns, they should ban conservatives instead. Problem solved.

    Friendly Reminder: It is perfectly legal to discriminate based on political affiliation. Do your part to help fight conservatism by excluding conservatives in your daily life. It is not appropriate to conduct business or keep relationships with such people.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [+] 21 points 3 years ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 20 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Oh yeah, well what about MY freedom to go to a beach and not be worried about getting fucking SHOT? Why do THEY get all these rights and freedoms while WE have to suffer the consequences? I don't fucking get it. What about our rights to not get shot?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 20 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

    USA: Has major gun violence problem.

    US legal system: yEw cANt tAYKE thUR fReeDUMB

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago (13 children)

    "Who needs guns on the beach"

    I'm trans. Id sooner never go. But if I had to, with the way things are going, you bet your ass I am afraid and would rather be armed

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [+] 12 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 11 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    That Supreme Court case was a ridiculous rewriting of historical facts.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›