this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
23 points (100.0% liked)

Australian News

551 readers
46 users here now

A place to share and discuss news relating to Australia and Australians.

Rules
  1. Follow the aussie.zone rules
  2. Keep discussions civil and respectful
  3. Exclude profanity from post titles
  4. Exclude excessive profanity from comments
  5. Satire is allowed, however post titles must be prefixed with [satire]
Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Banner: ABC

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

A whole months wage evaporated into thin air. That's really freaking sad. I really hope they all can get something from the eventual liquidation.

Also this quote:

"Centrelink is not enough to support a family — it's probably not even enough to support one person."

Not even a safety net for them to fall back on, the whole system is cooked.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Yeah, with the price of everything, it would be really bad for almost anyone to lose their job with zero notice. But to lose an entire months worth of income would be disastrous for a lot of people. There's only so much savings and family can help.

My first thought for a good safety net for cases such as these is perhaps the government should introduce some sort of wage guarantee, like what exists for personal bank accounts. An extra 0.5% business tax could be collected from businesses over a certain size, and in the event of any insolvency where they're unable to pay their staff, that fund is used to pay them a couple of months salary.

Or maybe something similar to super but for emergencies could be created and mandated. Or maybe the gov should stop acting like a few Centrelink payments will bankrupt them and hire some fucking staff so claims don't take 4 months to process

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I've never really thought before about how much money it takes to have an airline before other than "loads". Bonza has/had 6x Boeing 737s. Assuming a discount purchase price of about $80 million each, you can get an airline off the ground for under a billion dollars. I think that's less than I would have assumed.

I wonder now what it really costs per seat to operate? Let's simplify economy airline tickets to $100 per hour of flight time. Let's also assume that a plane spends a quarter of the time on the ground. So, 18 hours in the air at $100 per hour times 200 seats means a plane is generating $360k revenue per day.

I have no idea what running costs are - flight crew of 10? Lets double that to 20 for maintenance/customer service etc. Fuel? Maintenance? Airport fees? No idea what these add up to, but if you have over $2 Million dollars coming in per day as revenue, I have to assume I'm missing stuff here. Because I would not have thought an airline this small would have running costs that high. There's probably a good reason why I'm not running an airline!

I'd love to see what these numbers actually are.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

You wouldn't need to even buy the planes?

You might even be able to lease them.

Airport fees are expensive. Landing at melb for example I know costs a bomb which is why Avalon exists.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

You aren’t going to be able to do back of the napkin math on that one, it’s an incredibly complicated business.

There’s a reason most airlines have failed and many of the survivors have needed government bailouts. And the reason is not mismanagement across the board, although there’s plenty of that, too.