philosophy

Isn't the whole "paradox of tolerance" thing just an even mix of fash trolling and terminal libshit in the first place? Like the only reason someone would ever try to argue from it is if they're a civility fetishist liberal making excuses for why they have to aid and abet bigotry, or a fascist troll trying to demand you aid and abet their bigotry by imagining that to do anything else would be to commit the cardinal sin of hypocrisy.

Like the correct response to someone appealing to the paradox of tolerance is just :pit: :yes-comm:

:cure-for-fascism:

im confused about this post, maybe im not familiar enough with online debate-bros but i though the 'paradox of tolerance' was just about not tolerating people who aren't tolerant?

how does a fascist or liberal use the concept of 'fascists cannot be allowed in a tolerant society' to their ideological ends? why did this concept need fixing?

Yeah well have you heard of the logical fallacy of "I am rubber and you are glue" ?