204
submitted 2 years ago by SulaymanF@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 52 points 2 years ago

What a nightmare. Flying sucks even when nothing goes wrong.

[-] FartSmarter@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

Seriously, i was just on a plane that was stuck on the tarmac for around 20 minutes and the plane was super hot (thanks Phoenix) and I thought I was going to freak out at some point. Also made me realize I should really have a bottle of water with me on every flight

[-] Jeff@lemm.ee 35 points 2 years ago

United Airlines. Not surprised.

[-] kabe@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

American are just as bad. A similar thing happened to my wife last month.

She and a bunch of other passengers missed their connecting flights due to the airline's incompetence. She stood in line for four hours, without food or water, to wait her turn for American to get her on another flight but as she neared the end of the line the staff closed up their desks and said "sorry folks, come back tomorrow" and walked off, leaving her and about 50 other people to basically sleep on the floor and wait for them to re-open five hours later.

No mention of finding them a place to stay, nor providing even a bite to eat. Zip. Nada.

While it's not quite as bad as what these poor people went through, it's the same "not my problem; sucks to be you" energy from the airline.

[-] Izzent@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

This is what a lack of consumer protections gets you. In Europe this wouldn't fly (pun intended).

I believe the Department of Transportation actually has fairly strict regulations about this. Report the incident to them; they may be able to point you in the right direction for seeking recourse, even if they don’t get directly involved.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Southwest may be no frills, but I have never once had a problem.

[-] rynzcycle@kbin.social 27 points 2 years ago

After a delay screwed up our connection and caused us to miss part of our own wedding celebration with family 13 years ago, my wife and I have since always refered to United with the tag line, "United, Go f--- yourself".

I know a lot of airlines are just as bad, but we will forever hold United in the lowest of low esteem. They have absolutely created a company culture of the worst customer service in any situation. They don't even pretend to care.

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I flew United recently. I nearly missed one connecting flight due to their incompetence, and then on the way back I actually did miss that connecting flight, again because of their management. That entire flight was a fucking nightmare. Not least because numbered United customer service people just did not give one shit.

Plus, on one of the flights the flight crew spent the entire flight bitching about and mocking customers who were on their flight. They did this in both the area at the end of the plane and in the main cabin (just presumably not within earshot of them). The level of unprofessionalism and just plain arrogance was stunning. That entire flight crew didn't give one shit. They were surly and dismissive and complacent.

Like you, I will never be flying with them again. Though it sounds like what I went through was nothing compared to what these poor bastards in the linked article endured.

[-] rynzcycle@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Exactly, I manage customer service a good bit in my job, and I totally get that some customers are impossible to please, but you have to evaluate when it's actually your fault and in those cases do everything you can to make it better.

I'm not sure what their rules are, but if was me, I'd be making it rain food and hotel vouchers at the very least. And acting like you have an ounce of empathy if nothing else, you don't know what someone is missing because of these delays.

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Lufthansa is on my list... Left me stranded in an eastern European country with no way to resolve it except telling me to go into town to the office, or call them on the phone... As if I had a sim card that worked in the country and could be on hold for an hour. Had to book a hotel on my own dime and complaints were completely ignored.

[-] Waldowal@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

From the US DOT "FlyRights" page (which is woefully inadequate):

Some flights are delayed on the airport "tarmac" before taking off or after landing. DOT rules prohibit most U.S. airlines from allowing a domestic flight to remain on the tarmac for more than three hours unless:

  • the pilot determines that there is a safety or security reason why the aircraft cannot taxi to the gate and deplane its passengers, or
  • Air traffic control advises the pilot that taxiing to the gate (or to another location where passengers can be deplaned) would significantly disrupt airport operations.

U.S. airlines operating international flights to or from most U.S.airports must each establish and comply with their own limit on the length of tarmac delays on those flights. On both domestic and international flights, U.S. airlines must provide passengers with food and water no later than two hours after the tarmac delay begins. While the aircraft remains on the tarmac lavatories must remain operable and medical attention must be available if needed.

[-] Mr_Buscemi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Of course it was United lol.

Had a similar thing happen to me and my family on a United flight two years ago.

First after closing procedure were being done, the workers at the gate let a person through and they opened the plane door for them. The flight attendant was so pissed as now they had to redo every step from the beginning.

THEN we got told there was a broken part of the plane and we had to wait to see if they could get it fixed. After an hour waiting we got told we could go back to the airport to buy stuff or go to the bathroom.

When everyone got back, they started the pre-flight stuff again until a person walked up and said they walked onto the wrong plane. My flight attended just looked in shock and let them leave. Then tried to hid his frustration when announcing that anyone else who thinks they are in the wrong plane should speak now.

Another hour and then we got told it got fixed. The flight then began 4 hours late on a trip that was originally only going to be 4 hours.

[-] tallwookie@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

eh, the CEO's parents arent going to ride on the same airplane as the plebes. what kind of nonsensical logic is that?

[-] rynzcycle@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

Exactly, how are airlines and landlords the two service industries that get a complete pass at treating customers like we're lucky they let us give them our money. (And utilities, ISPs... I'm gonna need a bigger list aren't I?)

[-] OneTwoThreeFour@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago
[-] mlc894@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago

It’s in response to a quote from the article, “If the CEO - Scott Kirby’s parents were on that plane, would he have done something?” said Ieronimo.

[-] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

It’s called a hypothetical question

[-] Blastasaurus@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

My flight two weeks ago had to make an emergency landing in Winnipeg (ew) as two people became seriously ill due to it being so hot on board.

I wonder if flights are limiting a/c to save a buck?

[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Good question, but no. The temperature at jet cruising altitude is -20 degrees, generally the planes get affected by cold (feel the windows) and they actually pump in warm air from the engines. Why it got too hot on board is a mystery, did you feel too hot? Maybe a thermostat malfunctioned?

this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
204 points (97.7% liked)

News

36292 readers
3075 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS