32
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The names of previous Lemmy versions were all very boring and repetetive. We need something much more creative. Any ideas?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago

Eh, if someone on the team is feeling creative I don't mind fun version numbers but semantic versioning is quite searchable and reduces confusion.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

One does not exclude the other. You can have a fancy name and a semantic versioning.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

The problem is that it is almost always just one lf them. Let's say that v0.20 is called "Fuck Spez" and v0.21 is called "YouKnowWhatFuckMuskToo".

Most people are going to refer to them by either the number or the name, almost never are both used. The biggest problem with names is that they are rarely sortable (google did it with android, for a bit but not anymore), so in the future it is hard to know which is which without resorting to looking at a list of releases.

For example, in the future when we are on v0.30 someone might say "ah, but this has been an issue since "Fuck Spez"." And then most likely you have to look it up to know what they are talking about. If we coulld force everyone to alwaya write "version "Fuck Spez" (v0.20)" then it would be great, but that never happens.

I personally prefer just semantic versioning for this reason.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

What if the names were picked from whatever news was prominent during the release week. During last summer we could have had something like blackout or APIcalypse.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

People can search the name or SemVer and get the other name. It's not hard, not time-consuming, and it's way more fun. I genuinely miss when Android had dessert-themed names because it made the updates that much more exciting

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I think that's the case and why I said it's fine in my OC, but the more I think about it I'm slightly concerned it might cause some fragmentation "Does anyone know how to force a user sync in Lightfoot?" and "How can I sync users (forced) in v13.8.12?"

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah it muddles with searching for answers, especially when the names are common things. Apple can get away with naming macOS on places in California, but it’s going to be tough searching “having trouble posting comments on Thor” or whatever. The naming scheme can work, but it has to be very unique

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I have exactly this problem when trying to fix issues on my MacBook :(

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Hm... Good point.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Based on classification? Taken from a Wikipedia article concerning lemmings.

[-] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

It's software versioning, not a new breakfast cereal

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Motörhead had 23 studio albums.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

This, it means sooner or later there will be a Lemmy version called Orgasmatron.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

We've been notoriously bad about doing more frequent releases, but if we were to release every month, then naming them could get annoying really quickly.

I'd prefer to just stay with the semantic version numbering, like a lot of projects with a ton of releases do. Like look at react's releases.

The fun named versioning makes sense for operating systems, that release only like once a year, but not for apps, docker services, libraries, etc.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

We only do major versions around once a year so those could still be named, while using numbers for minor versions. Lemmy is more user-facing than react, so it would make sense to have a more user-friendly versioning.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I'd be good with that.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

So are you saying we are gonna get monthly updates 👀👀

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'd like that, we just have to be more disciplined about not adding breaking changes too often.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Take your time

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I agree that there shouldn't be official names for versions.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

No we don't.

Versioning like this is good for knowing how far off you are from current.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Hmm so you're looking for a naming theme like the old Android scheme of Desserts or MacOS California Parks.

List off the top of my head

  • Tree Species
  • Cities, Towns, Villages in Cuba
  • Mushroom Species
  • Names of Wildflowers

That's all I got for now.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

My vote is for the mushroom species, I also just love eating mushrooms 🍄🤤

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Add ridiculous titles for each version. For example. Lemmy Release v0.18.1: The Revengence

I just think it would be funny to have "Are you still on Revengence? Make sure you update to Snickerdoodle" pop up from time to time.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Numbers. All the stupid ubuntu names are cheese.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It sounds a bit too soon to use release names, especially given that Lemmy is still in alpha.

When a major release comes out, I suggest using colony names (fictional or real), like the pirate republic.

In general, I like names that highlight the decentralised aspect of the fediverse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Books of the Bible, Torah and Koran

The amount of controversy it would generate would propel Lemmy into international headlines.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

or chapters from "Das Capital"

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Having a name for a version would be nice for each major release (1.0.0 would have a name but 1.x.x wouldn’t, but 2.0.0 would, etc)

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Call the next one Final and the one after that Final.Final

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
  • goddamn.final
  • truly.final
  • final.i.swear
  • final.ffs
  • no.more.revision
  • no.more.revision.please
  • no.more.goddamn.revision
  • no.more.fcken.revisiom
  • no.more.revision.ffs
[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

use.this.one.actually

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I feel attacked.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I like the TeX version scheme, it starts with version 3. After that it's:
3.1
3.14
3.141
3.1415 etc. Current stable release is 3.141592653. The message is that each version is a more accurate approximation of pi. It's not growing much bigger, but better.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

This is fun but also incredibly awful

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Just like TeX :)

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Name it after famous Lemmy's.

V1.0 - Killmister
V2.0 - Koopa

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

The descriptions up until 0.18.5 seem very informative.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Music artists? Bands? Mountain names? Types of peppers? Either one would spice things up a bit I think lol

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Larry
Roy
Wendy
Iggy
Morton
Ludwig

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe various rodent species?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Instead of “release v20” how about “full release v20”

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Just use track titles of Motörhead. Major release could have album titles.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Species of apples

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Call me a shit stirer but I can’t help but wonder if this violates rule 3? Which I say not to have this removed from here but because of the IMO weirdness of not wanting any lemmy-support posts here as though lemmy isn’t a growing space in need of supporting new users.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

This isn't a support question, as in a trouble shooting question. This is a question to the Lemmy community about the platform itself. Its an input/feedback request, not a "how do I use Lemmy" question.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Fair ... I don't really care that much TBH ... it just seemed to be blurring the lines and I've always been ambivalent about the strident anti-support stance of this community ... so I thought it'd put it out there.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I mean, the poster is one of the two lead developers of the Lemmy platform. He might get a pass.

this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
32 points (71.6% liked)

Asklemmy

48682 readers
923 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS