Again?

OK, there's a MASSIVE gap between "illegal use of white phosphorus" and "chemical eradication", like, dude, be real.

SNOW is a beast of a platform that requires a team of skilled engineers to set up properly. 90% of companies don't hire those engineers and then do a surprisedPikachu.jpg when everything's on fire.

But I did work at a company that had those engineers once, and I'm still in awe at how excellent that system can be.

1. If that's your point, why did you write about the Sami people?
2. Source on "chemical eradication" in Lebanon, please. I searched for it but couldn't find anything.

You have two options:

1. your economic policy is such that your country can stand on its own two feet, even if barely.
2. your economic policy is such that if you don't get a bailout from abroad, everything blows up in your face.

The first one is "good, even if controversial". The second one is "horrible enough that will blow up without a bailout"

So, yes, if a leftist leader needed a massive bailout, their reforms would be considered bad.

Source of external money is irrelevant.

When your country is incapable of handling its own finances and needs a bail-out, it's not a good fiscal policy.

It's the exact same thing as right-wing weirdos associating the term "feminist" strictly with with the most extreme, fundamentalist, fringe elements of the movement, "feminazis" if you will, that went way over the equality hill and ended up in "all men are bad, m'kay" forest.

The fact that public media often reinforces that view does not help.

In short: the game is woke, because it showcases a gay romance with historical accuracy. Vavra thinks it's not woke, because it doesn't allow the player character to be a black lesbian with "them" pronouns.

Are you saying that you don't understand the concept of "consent", or that you find it ironic that while erotica/porn exists, some women's lives can be ruined by their nudes being leaked?

Are you sure you're being honest with this review? Considering how the US had to bail him out? Without that, his policy WOULD have exploded in his face.

For some distros you might have to switch to the iwd instead of networkmanager for wifi to work correctly. You might have to disable powersaving on your wifi or Bluetooth to work correctly (...)

And unless the people doing the "let's use Linux for however many days" challenge have that specific issue, they won't learn about it anyway.

On top of that - even if they said "OK, we're using specifically Mint for 30 days", and then you go out and try Mint, YOU might end up with massive issues, because your hardware is not supported properly.

They'd have to specify the OS and the hardware if you want a "reproducible experience".

The quality of the documentation and the user community also matters a lot in practice. Do they yell at noobs to RTFM or answer welcoming and politely?

In my experience, after looking through r/Linux, r/Linux4noobs, or the various Linux communities on Lemmy - you're going to get yelled at no matter the distro. It's a matter of timing and luck (who's currently online, and are they having a good day).

Did you just say Ubuntu four times?

That was kind of my point.

Yeah, I think I made a pretty strong refute of his points in this comment.

Unless the media wants to check up on the Uyghurs.