Did they base Mr Mackey off a billionaire? "Gotta make my nut."
Wow, so brave. Telling someone to "but a rifle" online.
Notes from the tactics:
- They're repetitive with they're rhetoric.
- Don't let them sound emotionally compelling to hide the real thing. What do the details look like.
- Explain the details of what they're trying to be emotionally compelling about from the past or now.
- Use removed from our society analogies so there is no emotional baggage.
- The right takes the worst of the worst and presents it as the whole.
- Showing one person (a character) says more than generalizing a group of people. Example: You don't talk about 100's of thousands of casualties in war, you talk about the one child's sock, alone on the ground.
- The left has to reclaim data as being down to earth and accessible since studies are just a collection of individuals' experiences. Get back to the emotional stories and details.
- Challenge how they came to that conclusion.
- Separate the person you're debating from the audience.
- The right are social scientists themselves and want to co-op the discipline, but also want to push out anyone else who disagrees with them. For example, kirk and peterson have very definite ideas about what genders look like, how men and women should interact and behave in the home, which is basically sociology. They don't want anyone else defining those things (practicing sociology).
- The right is using "biblical sociology." Have the sociology frameworks compete in the conversation with their details.
- There is no right way to do politics. Vote, protest, debate, join a union, etc., they're all good and do as many as you can.
Entire Kirk debate at Cambridge: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkiM-z0Mzyg
Yeah, it's funny, but I did downvote this post because I thought you were threads.
Edit: Also, I don't know if it's part of your shtick, but you can edit your post.
Your username says you're on threads. Are you a user here too sometimes?
Again, I know their schedule. Here are their priorities right now that's probably pretty to close to the correct order:
- Promote anything kirk that they can to keep that the conversation and not the nazi shit the admin is doing or the epstein connections for trump
- Serial downvote anyone, posts or comments, they think isn't promoting what they want.
- "Discuss" things in huge diatribes that really don't say anything and look like AI wrote, to hide genuine people's opinions.
- Try and get anything positive or fun downvoted by themselves, brigading or convince others to for "reasons."
- Cause a general vibe of anger on the front page.
You're on threads though. Why would it matter to you? FYI, threads is a horrible place to hang, not only because you could've edited your typo here on sh.itjust.works. You should be asking your instance.
True, true. A lot of them, maybe most of them, are trolls. I know their schedule.
Because this place isn't censored for their side, they're trying to break it.
I love how the microphone hides his mini-stroke droop.
pelespirit
0 post score0 comment score
I'm pretty sure it was because the password was compromised. That's what I've heard for a decade now.