Our apologies. Let us issue a correction:
"Agents should never be allowed to program"
There.
Our apologies. Let us issue a correction:
"Agents should never be allowed to program"
There.
Let it be known that the first person to call it was actually Sam Altman when OpenAI's paper on AI Scaling Laws in 2020 subtly showed that the diminishing returns will stop showing improvement with infinite power, compute time, and data before 94% accuracy is reached.
It will eventually be detected, but it passes tests before hitting production, that is the problem.
Humans generally don't hallucinate libraries or documentation. If there is a bug or error on a human maintaine repo the human in charge will generally know what went wrong and how to fix it, the AI will just gaslight your ass because the AI has no idea.
No, humans make less mistakes. Less. That's the key here, statistical models are trained on human data so by pure logic can never, ever, under any circuimstance, reach 100% accuracy. With current understanding of LLMs with a focus on AI Scaling Laws, and more importantly of natural human language adaptation, they will never reach 94% accuracy with infinite power and infinite training. That's what the curve shows us in OpenAI's 2020 research paper on AI Scaling Laws and later Deepmind's paper correcting their math, that the diminishing returns will hit a limit far before convergence.
In addition to that, the AI also cannot detect subtle changes to established problems or any new unaccounted for variables, because they're a statistical model and not capable of actual thought. They also lack any sense of responsibility for their actions for the same reason.
You fucking sloppers always try to say "HuMAnS mAkE misTAKeS, TOO!" Yeah and the fucking slopbots are trained on those mistakes and make them again but worse.
It's so nice to see some people speaking reason. If only any of those people ran multibillion dollar companies.
That's fair
My apologies but after talking with the team about finances the project got shelved. I am sorry if I got anybody's hopes up. I'll be sure to go check my email, now.
We should be surprised that there are still people at google decent enough to leave.
I bet something he didn't mention is he probably used a privacy distro on his personal device, and since Google no longer provides the Device Tree in ASOP it's left completely insecure, unable to update.
Crowdstrike as in the compant responsible for a global outage for machines using it including airports, hotels, fuelstations, banks, broadcasting, and manufacturing?
The company that accidentally made every impacted machine boot-loop because they accidentally added a whole bunch of empty lines of code to production?
For example if a device manufacturer provides drivers for linux, or a software developer has a version for Arch, but it's missing a pkg build or config file, most users simply won't be ably to figure out how to manually install it and CORE or Flathub probably don't have any official packages for it.
There are millions of such niche cases like this every day.