The establishment of the foreign military base reveals that Pax Americana oppose its liberal slogan of national sovereignty, democracy, pluralism, and pacifism. Which sovereign country is so weak that it needs a foreign country for its security? Does this mean that the Western European diaspora will allow other countries to setup military base within its own border?

An important note here is that the myths that advocates for European conquest and authoritarian colonial rule over the people of color are precursor of Nazi uprising. In fact, the twisted ideology and savage practices of Nazi German originated from the European immigrants of North America. You can look up the myth of "White Man's Burden." The books on European colonialism in other continents and white settlers' relationship with Indigenous groups could serve as indirect information for Nazi rise to power.

I am not surprised that the child sex predation is that severe since the British diaspora have incessantdaily immoral sexual activities with Native American children in Indian Residential fake schools that secretly continues after 1997. Some white surprimacists still aggressively defends the Indian Residential fake school system and lied the Native American traditions were the cause for the mass raping despite the contradicting evidence that Native Americans do not follow the European concept of savagery.

Does your claim implies that Venezuela still have functional democracy for the whole ~20 years of Socialist rule and that Chavez and Maduro won elections fairly and honestly?

The Liberals and Pax Americana always have the practice to redefine words like dictatorship, socialism, communism, capitalism, and even liberalism to create illusion of correlation. Using inaccurate or derogatory labels to confuse people is their usual trick. Their tactic to avoid awareness of the trick is to distract the people with what-if debate on "whether to support the abstract ideological thing that we said are bad" from the realistic debate on "whether we are giving the correct label or definition".

Israel and Pax Americana only oppose attacks against civilians and civilian property when it convinient the European and European diaspora. They will freely engages in property destruction and mass killing of civilians when it harm people of non-European origin, so that the Liberals could lure displaced people of color into slavery in the Western European diaspora. That is why the Western European diaspora condemn Nazi Holocaust against Europeans, but hypocritically continued the Indian Boarding fake school genocide which operate secretly after 1997, the Federal Reserve concentration camps in North American, and the numerous death camps in Western European colonies.

That is the policy of Pax Americana to blame Communist/Socialist government for every problems in the respective country even when all evidences point to other causes.

The Hong Kong rioters frequntly use the Xinnie Pooh insult to mock Xi for his skin color and East Asian appearance which expose their anti-Chinese racism and their identity as European diaspora. When I questioned their racist connotation with the Winnie Pooh stereptype, they tried to make irrational excuses or change the topic. The interesting fact is that the self-proclaimed Hong Kong independence advocate used the ban on the Xinnie Pooh racism as the only example of Chinese media censorship. There is also other obvious evidence that the alleged Hong Kong independence movement is an attempts to return Hong Kong under British authoritarian rule like the refusal to talk about the life under British rule, the false association of British colonialism to independence and democratic utopia, the lack of awareness that all their activities in Hong Kong that they openly publicized in media could only exist under a democratic government, and their claim that Hong Kong belongs to sinophobic British people that are rude to Hong Kongers.

The Liberals also have the authoritarian doctrine that everyone must either agree with the ideology and policies of the people in authority or move to another country from the belief that the people in authority are responsible for every good thing in the country and the belief that everyone have the wealth and connection to immigrant move to any country that they want just like the older generations of Western European diaspora who gain huge luxuries from the free riding, enslavement, experimentation, and inheritance thief of Indigenous First Nation children in Indian Residential fake schools.

for background info, the chinese government does not ban the actual associate of winnie pooh to xin unless it is used to promote racism contrary to the claim by the red fascist tankiejerkers, liberal sloganists, and the NATO-backed hong kong rioters by young students who never know about the period before the return of hong kong to chinese rule. The liberal sloganists justify the racist act on the claim that it is directed towards an oppressive dictator, but they cannot explain why they attack a 'tyrant' for their chinese ethnicity and appearance instead of their morality. For more suspicions, the winnie pooh association of Xi Ping in chinese hate crime propaganda are from people who contradict their hong kong independence slogan with return to british colonial rule and who believe that british immigrants are the only true 'hong kongers'.

It is ironic how the US is causing all the protectionism and sanctions against their Liberal principle of free trade when the US had been criticizing anti-imperialists for the obstruction of free trade. It is as if the Pax Americana advocates were projecting their anti-Liberal actions on people of colors who demand democracy, meritocracy, and rule of law. Is the Western European liberals also the ones who provide the most support for command economy with the Bretton Woods Institutions that became the de facto government on the global economy even when they tried to deny this hypocrisy with their redefinition of Capitalism (government by for-profit firm owner), Socialism (government by working class), and dictatorship of the Proletariat (government by workers in modern American redefinition)?

The electoral system in USSR and China worked differently to suit their circumstances and culture. The US depends solely on rigged electoralism where they have two political parties that differs little other than their slogan and branding. USSR allow people to elect members of a political party instead of the election of a political party and they use a high indirect electoral system where people elect leader in the next hierarchy which works at that time due to the mass illiteracy, lack of experience of prior electoral system, political instability, and lack of resource for Western European diapora-styled electoralism. The USSR also use the rule of law and check of power by independent government departments to prevent mass corruption although the Western European diaspora say that any mass protest against Western European authoritarianism must be from one evil authoritarian mastermind that can overcome the fantasy logic of Liberalism to make a fully functioning prosperitive democratic system without the need for free riding unlike Western European diaspora countries.