[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

tbh it's probably not going to be too complicated to switch to 1.0. the current api is generated from lemmy-js-client, but 1.0 api has an official openapi file. if there is a decently usable openapi generator for go that would probably not be too complicated to swap in instead and adjust the api calls in mlmym code.

[-] [email protected] 36 points 4 weeks ago

ethical ads are virtually non-existent. when limiting ads to ethical ads it's unlikely you're getting even remotely close to bringing in the necessary funds.

people promoting ads are typically those who expect others to suffer while they themselves are using ad blockers. there are some people who honestly turn off ad blockers, but i wouldn't recommend anyone to do that for any site, as i don't consider the majority of ads ethical and it's also often used as a malware/phishing/scam distribution mechanism.

this is also a vicious cycle of more people blocking ads -> ads getting worse to offset the lost ad revenue -> more people blocking ads. this is what lead to the internet today, where the majority of the internet is basically unusable if you don't use ublock origin or a comparable solution.

4
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Hello,

I’ve sent private messages to @[email protected] and @[email protected] almost a week ago with important information. I have not received a response and no action has been taken. Have these private messages not been received?

I also noticed that your caching setup is broken and will randomly serve the wrong type of content, as Lemmy has broken caching headers that don't work with standard caches out of the box. I just raised an issue on GitHub about this as well: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/5632

It's possible that these caching issues are causing federation issues and may also explain https://lemmy.studio/post/2675594.

6
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Hello,

I've sent a private message to @[email protected] almost a week ago with important information. I have not received a response and no action has been taken. Has this private message not been received?

[-] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago

with the content i've seen it gave me more of an impression of being captures of a live stream, but that's just guessing

[-] [email protected] 53 points 1 month ago

we looked into it, we currently believe that to be a copycat not related to the other pms.

the lemmy.world account involved in that was most certainly compromised from an unrelated data breach and all connections originated from IPs linked to an anonymization service, so there's also not much to follow up on.

we will reconsider this if it happens again.

[-] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago

I don't know if others have, I only know that we (Lemmy.World, Fedihosting Foundation) have not reported it to the police.

I don't have high hopes that the police would be able to do anything about this. For the harassment against the person shown in the images, that would likely have to be reported by them directly for the police to take that up.
For random online spam, as in harassment of fediverse users receiving the PMs, that seems like it would be an extremely low priority for police. It's also likely fairly difficult to impossible to follow up on, considering that the person sending the PMs most likely used a VPN to access these accounts.

[-] [email protected] 212 points 1 month ago

to be honest, this should have been done way earlier.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago

partial breakage, the stuff that people on other instances have already been experiencing for a while.

iirc there are still some additional issues with sync arising with the update, but it won't be entirely broken.

[-] [email protected] 63 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

the domain you posted a link to was in our automod blacklist due to previously being used by spam bots.

upon review it appears that this domain serves user generated content by different users that can be determined in the URL path. in those cases we typically only ban those users rather than the entire site if it's not overly spammy.

we also usually review automod actions quickly, although in this specific case we must have missed this, as we had a lot of other true spam removals in the last days.

you have been unbanned from LW and your post has been restored.

[-] [email protected] 79 points 5 months ago

not at all. nobody can revert edits, only the creator can edit it again.

moderators can restore removed (mod action) posts and comments, but not deleted (creator action) posts and comments.

[-] [email protected] 79 points 6 months ago

this comment section is not a place to rant about other instances

[-] [email protected] 31 points 9 months ago

calling other people pedophiles is not trolling.

such allegations can be life-ruining and should not be done lightly.

[-] [email protected] 46 points 11 months ago

it was a significant part of the brand of a spam/advertisement campaign several months ago

view more: next ›

MrKaplan

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF