[-] [email protected] 6 points 13 hours ago

Hot take: if it takes a woman-specific PLE for you to care about creating good stories for the women, you’re doing it wrong.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Well, it is the Register

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

In the context of this community and the movement in general, ‘self-hosting’ is designed to contrast against the larger trend of “let me just trust one of the big cloud companies with all my stuff”. We’ve seen how that can go very, very wrong. So, the idea of maintaining control of your data and the methods by which it is accessed is the heart of ‘self-hosting’. It’s not meant to restrict one to only computers stored in one’s home.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago

Ok, but you came seeking us. Please do us the kindness of answering the question while also pointing us towards the FAQs.

[-] [email protected] 37 points 10 months ago

Love another iOS option.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago

This is good stuff. Has it been posted to the project’s GitHub (issue, discussion, etc.)?

[-] [email protected] 77 points 11 months ago

I love how the ONE time they did, all the fears were validated.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

Is this driver advocating to prevent the extinction of manual transmission vehicles, or are we to preserve product documentation ?

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

You’ll need to be far more descriptive than “I can’t get it to work.” I can almost guarantee you that Fedora is not the problem.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

self-hosted doesn't have to mean 'hosted at home'

[-] [email protected] 30 points 2 years ago

The monthly payment on my 25-year, 7% loan for my solar installation is less than the average power bill. My solar system generates more than I need. Assuming rates never go down, I’m in good shape.

-11
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

As is stated in the title, I created and moderated [email protected]. According to the modlog, this community was removed 10 days ago. The modlog doesn't show me who removed the community. I understand the community wouldn't necessarily be everyone's cup of tea, but the actions taken seem improper.

EDIT

After making my case via email to [email protected], I received the following response:

"We would rather not have a prolife community on our instance. We were getting a lot of reports about it and we have enough on our plate. I'm sure you can find an instance that better suits your needs."

This community was incredibly small (19 subscribers), had less than 10 postings, and had several waves of trollings. Yet, the admins of lemmy.world would rather do away with this community than bother to review if it has broken any rules or is the target of trolling/bullying. I take nothing away from the right to run their instance as they see fit. Perhaps the Code of Conduct should also explicitly state "we reserve the right to do anything we want, regardless of any published rules".

212
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
19
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
Stay the course, lads! (mastodon.social)
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
view more: next ›

HybridSarcasm

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF