[-] [email protected] 0 points 15 hours ago

Sounds to me like you want to keep your bigoted opinions yet still expect to be accepted by people who don't like bigotry.

So yeah, a centrist. In the "conservative dating profile" sense.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 15 hours ago

No, I simpily side with research.

You side with anything that will keep trans people from participating as equals in society.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 15 hours ago

Plus, what’s to stop a bunch of terrorists from dressing up like ICE and doing whatever they want?

That's just called ICE.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 16 hours ago

You side with bigots. You will always require more research as a stalling tactic.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 16 hours ago

Would the right wing accept me or would they be as friendly as you lot are?

You're asking us to accept bigoted opinions and threatening to go to the right like you weren't there already.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 16 hours ago

Sure. just bring up divisive right wing talking points. And then call yourself a centrist.

It tracks.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

Because lemmy isn't reddit and as a result has little patience for anti-trans bigotry.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago

I know the trans-women in sport issue is almost non-existent but it’s probably the biggest talking point in the comments it seems.

Says the person who brought it up.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago

Those weren't the actions of the left. Those were the actions of the democratic party establishment.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 23 hours ago

One of my favorite hypotheticals is that once someone gets to a billion money they get a trophy that says “I won capitalism” and anything over the limit goes to folk who need it.

And they name a dog park after you. That part is crucial.

[-] [email protected] 85 points 23 hours ago

Centrists already hated him, and now he said their gods shouldn't exist.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

You mean the continuing resolution that would have caused a government shut down which Trump would have used to take more power

That's a cute excuse. If they're not going to ever use the filibuster, they should have killed it to protect Roe and voting rights. But since the filibuster is an easy way to block progressive legislation, they won't. They won't play offense when they have the ball and won't play defense when they lose the ball.

and a meaningless symbolic vote?

Yeah, democrats have sunk to the level where they won't even do meaningless symbolic shit.

101
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Democratic Sens. Richard Durbin (Ill.), Catherine Cortez Masto (Nev.), John Fetterman (D-Pa.), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Maggie Hassan (N.H.), Gary Peters (Mich.), Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.) and Brian Schatz (Hawaii) (Nev.) all voted "yes" in addition to Schumer, — as did Maine's Angus King, an Independent who caucuses with Democrats.

109
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
195
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

In each of the separate lawsuits state regulators filed, dozens of internal communications, documents and research data were redacted — blacked-out from public view — since authorities entered into confidentiality agreements with TikTok.

But in one of the lawsuits, filed by the Kentucky Attorney General’s Office, the redactions were faulty. This was revealed when Kentucky Public Radio copied-and-pasted excerpts of the redacted material, bringing to light some 30 pages of documents that had been kept secret.

-5
Texas ping (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The stars at night are big and bright.

view more: next ›

Ensign_Crab

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago