242
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 121 points 2 weeks ago

Shall we conclude that Pete turned down Tucker's advances

[-] [email protected] 27 points 2 weeks ago

Tucker was simply fake hitting on Pete to test if Pete was truly gay or not, obviously.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago

Tucker: Pete wouldn’t let me stuck his dick. Definitely not gay.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

Tucker truly is a penetrative journalist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 92 points 2 weeks ago

Tucker thinks about gay sex more than most gay men.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

just imagine his bowtie spinning whenever he gets 'flustered'.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

“This is the way.”

[-] [email protected] 79 points 2 weeks ago

Wait. This isn't the Onion?

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

wow, Pete's turn getting his skull measured came sooner than I thought. I thought they'd get rid of the racial minorities first

[-] [email protected] 49 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Tucker, you need to learn to move on when your love interest won't go out with you.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 2 weeks ago

TELL ME ABOUT GAY SEX DAMN IT! DESCRIBE IT TO ME IN VIVID DETAIL! LEAVE NOTHING OUT!

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago

My aunt is transphobic and explained the surgeries to me in vivid detail. She was trying to convince me it was somehow wrong because it was disgusting and I was just like "why do you know all this?". She claims to be so disgusted by it but went out of her way to research it.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

Show her a video of a knee replacement surgery.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

You man a transition from broken knee to working? Disgusting! A wheelchair is what dog intended, as foretold in the Bible!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

THERE WAS CANDLES AND SMOOTH JAZZ

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago

I’ve met seemingly normal people who think Tucker Carlson is a real political commentator with good ideas.

[-] [email protected] 43 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe they have him confused with Chris Tucker. I can see the resemblance.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

Ridiculous broadcaster. It matches.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

Tucker Carlson makes Ruby Rhod look like Walter Cronkite.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

After he literally argued in court that no reasonable person would believe anything he says is true.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 2 weeks ago

lmao

He added that if he ever interviews Buttigieg, “I’m gonna ask him very specific questions about gay sex and see if he can even answer. I doubt he even knows. You’re not gay, dude. Stop.”

Wait, is tucker in the epstein files?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 26 points 2 weeks ago

Tucker’s a little curious.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 2 weeks ago

Typical conservative

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago

I hope Pete calls Tucker’s bluff because I am extremely curious what specific knowledge the latter has about gay sex that the former can confirm.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

Haha, I was wondering what he would even ask.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago

"I'd need like ... specific details. Maybe even use my name in place of your partner... You'd have to draw some pictures too, or better yet take photos. Lots of photos."

[-] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago

Tucker’s wants sex with Buttigieg, adorable.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago

Tucker, secretly gay, needs some advice on gay sex. Smart move fucker! No one sees through your cover.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago

Tucker Carlson is a little bitch.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago

Is Tucker Carlson gatekeeping gayness?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago

Bro just wants to take notes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Oh yeah? Well if you're so gay then why can't I suck your girthy dick?

-- Tucker "The Sucker (Throat Goat)" Carlson

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago

Hey Tucker, you're a fake straight until you give me intimate details about your sexual life :3

[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

So Carlson thinks he needs to take Pete for a test drive to verify his bona fides?

I doubt if Buttigieg would have an interest in such an ordeal.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

That segment would be really, really popular given how puritanical and misogynistic their core audience is. Lots of fan boys re-watching that segment in the dark after the wife goes to bed.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

carlson's kgb handler: "become relevant again or internet show is cancelled, da?" (sweaty carlson proceeds to further debase himself for clicks)

[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

So based upon the principles of them always projecting, I guess this means Tucker Carlson is fake straight.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

Tucker will of course be able to make these judgements from, uh, experiences he’s… had relayed to him from some of his friends, the good gays you know. Not those nasty gays, which are most of them. And it’ll be all good because he’ll proclaim no homo, which proves that he is straight

[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

I fucking hate the rat, but this is when you gotta hit them with the 'weird'

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

"Where is it? How can I have some?"

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

Tucker Carlson is a lizard person wearing a human skin. He should allow himself to be flayed on live TV to prove otherwise.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

Tucker: "So, say you and I were in bed, what, SPECIFICALLY, would you do... SPECIFICALLY. I mean leave nothing out."

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

Please, Daddy Carlson, show us what you know about doing a gay sex on someone.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Questions that only Tucker Carlson would know.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

The only thing Tucker Carlson deserves is an inescapable pit of sewage to starve to death in.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

Is that because Tucker would know?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Sounds like Tucker wants some new gooning material.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

You know I think Tucker would know what dick taste like better then Pete.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
242 points (95.5% liked)

politics

25717 readers
3351 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS