55
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

The headline in the news banner just had impeccable comedic timing: "First next-gen superheavy possibly under construction" a few seconds after the rocket exploded

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Yeah it did. Wowsers!

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Holy fuck. When was this? The last time something like this happened at Starbase was before the integrated flight tests started. With this, plus the recent suborbital Starship failures, it's really not looking great for the program.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There’s a timestamp in the photo. Yesterday at 23:00 CDT.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

That's a glorious boom

But that's why they do testing, it's cheaper to boom on testbed than on a launch pad or in the air

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

But the idea behind doing things with the risk of them going boom is to learn things. I'm not sure they're learning what they need if they're going from testing Starship in launches to going back to static firing. If the idea is to rework the engines for Starship, I have to wonder if that's a fundamental enough step to put the entire project back to pretty much square one.

[-] [email protected] -3 points 2 days ago

Could you possibly whitewash this any harder?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don't think that means what you think it means.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago

What do you think whitewash means?

[-] [email protected] 0 points 17 hours ago

Covering up the truth by means of displaying fake information, like saying it doesn't apply here because there was no data involved and the source was not a political entity.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

Thanks for the vocabulary suggestion and modified definition, but my usage of the term was just fine.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Agreed. "Spin" would be the better word.

It's another embarrassment added to a long list of embarrassments at this point. SpaceX has utterly failed to deliver on its contracts and at some point people need to recognize that the private sector does not always do it better. Especially when the company is run by a conman.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

And our tax dollars.

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
55 points (98.2% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8160 readers
582 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS