6
submitted 8 hours ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/socialism@lemmy.ml
[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)
18
submitted 9 hours ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/china@lemmy.ml
[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 hours ago

Who's going to do that exactly? They are your ruling class, and that makes them immune to their own laws.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 24 points 9 hours ago

The fundamental problem here is capitalism because it's a system designed to concentrate wealth in the hands of the few. As long as capitalist relations remain, nothing will change.

16
submitted 10 hours ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
7
submitted 10 hours ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
5
submitted 10 hours ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/canada@lemmy.ml
9
submitted 10 hours ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/canada@lemmy.ca
[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 hours ago

I absolutely hate the fact that every chat app now has a proprietary protocol and you have to install a bunch of apps to talk to different people. It's such a travesty.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 hours ago

what you mean turn it into a parody platform, like it wasn't that already 🤣

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Same here, having watched how the lives of my friends who had kids changed reaffirmed the decision of not having any for me. You basically have to be prepared to dedicate next couple of decades of our life to raising kids and not doing much of anything else. And you end up giving up the freedom to do things like move to a different town or try a new career. Your primary goal in life becomes having stable income to raise your kids.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 12 points 12 hours ago

Maybe they figure they have enough of a base now and actually want further polarization leading to civil violence which the fascists will then use to justify taking civil liberties away.

10
submitted 12 hours ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 26 points 12 hours ago

Biden presided over a literal genocide and was proud of it.

20
submitted 13 hours ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
18
submitted 13 hours ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
112
submitted 13 hours ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
129
submitted 13 hours ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 12 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

You're working very hard to miss the point here which is that Biden admin would have been willing to commit this atrocity as well. That's what he's saying. It's not a hypothetical of whether or not Biden would've done the same thing Trump did. It's a declaration of intent and it illustrates the continuity of policy. It doesn't matter which shit stain rules over you, they all follow the same genocidal agenda. And by trying to carry water for them, you're directly enabling this fascist system to keep going.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 14 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Biden admin only facilitated a literal genocide in Gaza and a proxy war in Ukraine. What he says, very plainly, is that Biden admin would have done the same atrocities that Trump admin is doing. You live in a fascist state buddy, and you better start acknowledging it because anything else makes you a collaborator.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 20 points 14 hours ago

The Burger Reich has been claiming that Iran is on the verge of developing nuclear weapons literally for decades now. Anybody with even a minimally functioning brain understands that this is just a pretext for starting a war.

60
submitted 15 hours ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/ontario@lemmy.ca
[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 16 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I see your English comprehension isn't too good:

In July 2024, Secretary Blinken claimed Iran was one or two weeks away from having enough fissile material breakout capacity to eventually make a weapon if Iran had decided to do so. There were indirect negotiations that the Biden administration did, but it went nowhere. So when President Trump argues that he did when no other president would, is it just simply that the bill was coming due and it fell on his watch?

I do think there's a certain element to that. And that's why I was supportive of President Trump joining in in June to take the strikes, that we had thought internally in the Biden administration, we may have to take, if there was a second term, we thought that the spring, summer of 2025 was probably, we may have to be there in the same place. And we did war games, we did some practice runs on what it would look like to look into it, because that may have had to happen under our watch as well. But he said we obliterated their nuclear program. The question then is not about what he did in June. This war we were in now did not attack the nuclear facilities again. This was not about the nuclear. So the question now becomes, can you do a deal with the Iranians? And the maximumist positions that both sides have are right now very far apart, despite all the rhetoric that we're almost there or we are there, but if we're not there, we'll bomb the hell out of them.

view more: next ›

yogthos

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 6 years ago
MODERATOR OF