2
submitted 10 hours ago by hucste@lemmy.ml to c/obsd4a@lemmy.ml

Traduction de l'article EN → FR 'OpenSMTPD Is The Mail Server For The Future' décrivant la bascule d'exim vers OpenSMTPD définitive dans OpenBSD, depuis la v7.9 — article de Peter N.M. Hansteen

2
submitted 14 hours ago by hucste@lemmy.ml to c/openbsd@lemmy.ml

The SMTP mail server for the 21st century and onwards is OpenSMTPD, which is developed as an integral part of OpenBSD, but available in a portable variety too.

It was one of those things that I had fully intended to do years ago, but I only got around to actually doing once there was a definite deadline to get it done.

The time has come, as OpenBSD 7.9 will leave the exim package behind, and exim users will need to find a replacement before upgrading. This article describes my transition to OpenBSD's own OpenSMTPD mail server.

4
BSDNow: 663: Proxhyve (www.bsdnow.tv)
submitted 1 day ago by hucste@lemmy.ml to c/bsd@lemmy.ml

Switching from Proxmox to Sylve, FreeBSD Quarterly report, FreeBSD's laptop program, Migrating ZFS, Haiku and OpenSSL news, and more…

5
submitted 1 day ago by hucste@lemmy.ml to c/bsd@lemmy.ml

The NetBSD project is pleased to announce the fourth (and this time hopefully final) release candidate of the upcoming 11.0 release, please help testing! See the release announcement for details.

7
submitted 2 days ago by hucste@lemmy.ml to c/freebsd@lemmy.ml

FreeBSD 15.0 had aimed to provide a KDE desktop install option from its text-based OS installer to make for a more compelling FreeBSD out-of-the-box desktop experience. That was then delayed to FreeBSD 15.1 but that didn't end up materializing. Now the KDE desktop install option is diverted to FreeBSD 15.2...

2
submitted 2 days ago by hucste@lemmy.ml to c/openbsd@lemmy.ml
3
submitted 2 days ago by hucste@lemmy.ml to c/openbsd@lemmy.ml

Network-oriented readers will be familiar with the concept of overload tables, commonly used with state tracking options to create adaptive rulesets for such things as punishing password-guessing botnets. A downside to tables that would tend to fill up indefinitely is that at some point they will be quite full, and the administrator would need to either manually run pfctl expire or set up a crontab entry to weed out old entries at intervals.

8
submitted 3 days ago by hucste@lemmy.ml to c/openbsd@lemmy.ml

Every single software product is dealing with the question about what to do with “AI”-generated code, but the question is particularly difficult to answer for open source operating systems like Linux distributions and the various BSDs, which often consist of a wide variety of software packages from hundreds to thousands of different developers. On top of that, they also have to ask the “AI” question for every layer of their offering, from the base install, to the official repositories, to community-run ones…

7
submitted 3 days ago by hucste@lemmy.ml to c/freebsd@lemmy.ml

“The server feels slow.” It is the most common ticket text in the world, and the least useful. Before you can fix anything you need to know whether the box is CPU bound, memory pressured, waiting on disk, saturating a NIC, or simply running a runaway process in one jail that is starving everyone else. On jail hosts, the second half of the problem is attribution: not just what is overloaded, but which jail is responsible…

3
submitted 3 days ago by hucste@lemmy.ml to c/openbsd@lemmy.ml

Florian Obser (florian@) recently gave a BSD-NL talk entitled "Let's find out how to get predictable IPv6 addresses assigned to OpenBSD VMs".

Florian takes us on a guided tour of how inet6 autoconf actually works, with enlightening and entertaining peeks into selected piece of OpenBSD source.

At the end, we are asked to "now, draw the rest of the owl".

12
submitted 4 days ago by hucste@lemmy.ml to c/debian@lemmy.ml

An effort to revive and reinvigorate the 2002 Gtk2 GUI programming toolkit is growing and gaining interest… as we predicted would happen a few months ago.

46
submitted 5 days ago by hucste@lemmy.ml to c/debian@lemmy.ml

With half-way through the Debian 14 "Forky" development cycle, the Debian release team is out with an update this weekend and some big news.

[-] hucste@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago

I understand your point about FrankenDebian. Personally, I don’t think that’s the issue in these contexts.

I don’t have the answer to your question; you’ll need to check with the project leads.

Edit: I’m not familiar with backports-sloppy

[-] hucste@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

As far as I can tell, it would seem so; let me explain:

  • backports are Debian Team official

  • extrepo is managed by Debian Team officially, since 2019/11, to offers packages not included on Stable, Testing; Debian Team is responsible for officially integrating unofficial third-party repositories to the Stable branch; the process involves checking and verifying that the third-party repository is ‘clean’—as far as possible—or, rather, free from malicious code or malware; The manager of a third-party repository is responsible for its contents.

  • Debian Fast Track is an alternative repository to package for Stable branch, officially, since 2018/12. See:

  • Fast Forward Debian is an initiative of Daniel Baumannwho is a Debian developer, his DDPO, since 2025/12; this is considered by Debian Team officially as Debian derivative distribution — which means that the DFSG must be strictly adhered to!

extrepo, Debian Fast (Track|Forward] are managed on Debian Infrastructure!

So, unless I am mistaken, it is safe to say that yes, these third-party projects meet the same standards and quality requirements as the official project.

[-] hucste@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago

There is no problem with using the backports repositories or apps. The point is that sometimes, even in the backports archive, certain software are no longer maintained; this is the case with tilde, for example, which is still maintained for Testing and Sid… or not at all.

Instead of installing apps, the Debian team or certain team members have set up official system for managing software that has been ported, either because it is too recent or due to licensing issues, via the Fast (Track|Forward) and extrepo repositories.

This is why you’ll find a number of packages in these ‘official’ repositories that are not, or are no longer, in the stable repositories.

This doesn’t radically change your system, as the packages in these repositories are packaged for the stable branch.

(I hope I’ve understood correctly and, above all, summarised the point well)

[-] hucste@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Ohhh!

But the package is always available for testing and Sid!

?!

Egual, saddly, it's not available on extrepo, nor fast forward. :(

view more: next ›

hucste

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 4 years ago
MODERATOR OF