[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

They're just not really useful. None of this was a huge problem before. LLMs make short work of some scenarios but mostly they take longer to correct than the skilled person would have taken to write from scratch.

LLMs have no redeeming qualities outside of science, none, zero. Binary null.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 4 hours ago

Yes, in a perfect world, the use of LLMs and the like (there is no AI), would be a good way to extend human capabilities. We dont live in that world. In the world we live in, LLMs are net negative for workers, the planet and even small businesses, period.

LLMs should only be used in scientific scenarios. Profiting of them should be outlawed and energy usage should generally be priced exponentially, not only for LLMs.

As someone who works in the field, the whole topic is hype only for those not understanding LLMs and those only understanding LLMs and not reality. We have neither the need for large scale LLM rollout, nor do we have a big benefit from it. Stop believing such nonsense please.

So, get us a stateless, classless society and then you can have LLMs, not before.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

Very informative! Thanks a lot! :)

[-] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago

Thank you for clarifying. That helps a great deal! :)

[-] [email protected] 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

But many people did work on afaq, no?

Edit: what things do you think are biased on afaq? I feel like a link to a critique would help.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 15 hours ago

I sure hope not. Play on someone else's pc if you want them to have control.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 15 hours ago

The guardian in general is a pretty trustworthy source afaik.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Interesting! It shouldnt be that slow. Any idea why?

53
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/31221716

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

Das highlight an der Geschichte ist dass es dazu einen netten wikipedia eintrag zu richtern gibt die in der antikapitalistischen linken sind.

[-] [email protected] 41 points 1 day ago

I suppose this person needs some advice from someone who actually lives in that hellhole and can judge if its not better to just die instead of fucking up the inheritance by going to the ER.

This is the best anticapitalist propaganda I have ever seen and its not even intentional.

To everyone who thinks this is a worthy system: i wont piss on you if you're on fire.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

Sadly, this is a common misconception. Capitalism has no inherent benefits in terms of innovation. The people innovating innovate no more or less because they are pitted against each other. The reason people are able to innovate is because they have education and expertise. It is pretty clear that, given the chance, even more people would try and innovate on stuff they like. That isnt the case because they would need to find a job in the field first and even if they were able to do it, capitalists would claim it for them. I can iterate on this for hours but the fact stands that the innovation of capitalism is a myth.

307
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/38044536

Protestation

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

As many people suggested, you dont need an instance but a community.

But i wanna go over something else in your post.

Describing your experiences it sounds like youre dealing with some tough times. Please make sure you're safe and try to get help if possible. You can do a lot of different things from here.

There are a lot of mental health centric communities already which should all federate with your current instance. Make sure to check them out.

What will probably also help if you have some hurt to deal with is a safe space where peeps dont troll you for stuff that happened to you. There are many chats that provide a safe space to talk about stuff. Sadly, they are on proprietary platforms mostly. But you could be the person to make eg a matrix chat to discuss such things.

In any case, good luck and lmk if you need more info.

176
Soon (sub.wetshaving.social)
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
23
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://leminal.space/post/20980927

When television first started, there were 3 channels and a handful of commercials. After a few decades of more channels and more ads appearing, cable showed up. Now you could pay a subscription to get premium content without ads!

But after a decade, not only were they putting ads on cable you paid a premium to watch, they were speeding up both the shows and the ads to fit more into breaks that kept getting longer.

Younger people are just starting to see the cycle is underway again with streaming services, but over the last 10ish years, I've noticed all the various cliques going "why is {our interest} going to shit" as if it were an isolated incident and not happening everywhere.

The first act of capitalism when it was created was the slave trade. Corporations have always been vehicles the ultra rich use to extract wealth.

Revenue is how much money a company brings in selling things. Profit is how much of that remains after paying for materials, leases, power, reinvesting into the business, and paying wages. Basically, CEOs are paid 300x more than employees to defer maintenance and suppress wages.

Economics 101- charge as much as you can, pay as little as possible. Any corporation that makes billions in profit only does so by gouging customers and stiffing workers.

Real wages are stagnant, pensions aren't a thing, and they're trying to get rid of social security. There's a reason we're told to use things like HSA, 529s, and 401ks: it enriches the already rich.

There is something called a fiduciary duty to shareholders which basically means publicly traded corporations must act in the best interest of investors. It SOUNDS like a good idea, but it's not really well defined.

The reality of the situation is BlackRock basically owns the stock market and the Federal Reserve.

The Federal Reserve is owned and controlled by a group of banks- not the US government. Those banks are publicly traded corporations that own chunks of everything and each other. It's a giant rich guy circle jerk that basically means the recent uniform RTO mandates were probably from Larry Fink himself due to how central commercial real estate is to collateral for things like naked shorting.

Inflation isn't things costing more; it's the dollar being worth less as more money exists. The reason the rich buy art, watches, and shit is because they benefit from inflation. If you hold on to $5,000 for a decade you have $5,000 that buys less after a decade of inflation. If you buy a painting, jewelry, or whatever, it appreciates overtime being worth more than $5k.

Federal minimum wage was 7.25 in 2008. Not much, but you could buy 1-3 shares of AMD or 18" of Subway. Today, M2 (a measure of money in the economy) is three times what it was in 2008 and minimum wage is still $7.25 and might get you 6" of sandwich. AMD, on the other hand, currently sits around $120 a share.

Someone that works to eat will always be falling behind while someone that's not struggling can just load up on wealth that keeps growing. A majority of the country doesn't have money on hand to deal with a $500 emergency while more than half the wealth of the country is owned by a handful of people that make lifetimes of wealth through passive investments alone.

Unfortunately, it's all very complicated and basically everyone is stupid most of the time with only brief windows of subject specific competence. Reason and rationality is a best case outcome but people act like it's the default.

Welcome to the meat grinder. None of us matter.

9
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/31048979

19
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/30886747

Title kind of says it all but it's still baffling. Running an old ass amd fx with 24 gig ram in the other computer. Work laptop is an i7 with 64 gigs of ram and is still slower in daily use. Both have ssd boot drives.

Granted im comparing desktop and laptop. But a 15 year difference is pretty crazy to me.

8
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
4
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
32
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/31247320

28
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/31250679

"this morning, as I was finishing up work on a video about a new mini Pi cluster, I got a cheerful email from YouTube saying my video on LibreELEC on the Pi 5 was removed because it promoted:

Dangerous or Harmful Content Content that describes how to get unauthorized or free access to audio or audiovisual content, software, subscription services, or games that usually require payment isn't allowed on YouTube.

I never described any of that stuff, only how to self-host your own media library.

This wasn't my first rodeo—in October last year, I got a strike for showing people how to install Jellyfin!

In that case, I was happy to see my appeal granted within an hour of the strike being placed on the channel. (Nevermind the fact the video had been live for over two years at that point, with nary a problem!)

So I thought, this case will be similar:

  • The video's been up for over a year, without issue
  • The video's had over half a million views
  • The video doesn't promote or highlight any tools used to circumvent copyright, get around paid subscriptions, or reproduce any content illegally

Slam-dunk, right? Well, not according to whomever reviewed my appeal. Apparently self-hosted open source media library management is harmful.

Who knew open source software could be so subversive?"

20
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/65914345

31
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/31634181

I started to notice some thing weird while using Reddit, every link post from Condé Nast owned news outlet was getting a high amount of upvotes and awards while other publications had a very normal rate of awards( usually zero, with the exception of the sponsored ones) and upvotes.

That when I started to investigate this matter till I found out about this.

They are boosting their publications on Reddit on the major subreddits. They are trying to give their publications a advantage over all the other news outlets.

They have the ability to kill the other news outlets if they keep doing that. Avoid them as if your freedom is dependent on it.

view more: next ›

haui_lemmy

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF