36
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

It was talked about like a really big deal, and that it dealt a blow towards the Controlled Digital Lending-scheme. IA also had to remove 500k books. But how is Internet Archive able to keep continuing lending out many books as they were before? What were the real consequences of Hachette v. Internet Archive?

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Not much. IA was avoiding the copyright laws that affected everyone else. They got away with it because they were so well known. The current law is bad and should be changed. If IA won, it would have been a huge boon for libraries and schools. But having lost only means everything stays the same.

IA can lend books that copyright holders haven't yet issued a takedown.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Thanks for explaining!

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Hundreds of millions of dollars in punitive damages, resulting in bankruptcy. The IA shuts down immediately, their assets are auctioned, and soon fragments of their server racks appear in trophy cases in the lobbies of intellectual-property enforcement organisations.

this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
36 points (100.0% liked)

Books

6028 readers
22 users here now

A community for all things related to Books.

Rules

  1. Be Nice. No personal attacks or hate speech.
  2. No spam. All posts should be related to books.

Official Bingo Posts:

Related Communities

Community icon by IconsBox (from freepik.com)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS