Honesty, empathy and respect.

Good luck ever convincing me an LLM has any of those. I'm not even convinced most of humanity does.

It's mostly a relic from an older time, it can be useful for more traditional services and situations that struggle with sharing public IPs. In theory, things like multiple IP addresses (and IPv6's near unlimited addresses) could be used to make things simpler -- you don't need reverse proxies and NAT and port forwarding (all of which were once viewed as excessive complexity if not outright ugly hacks instead of the virtual necessity they are today).

Each service would have its own dedicated public IP, you'd connect them up with IP routing the way the kernel gods intended, and everything would be straightforward, clear, and happy. If such a quantity of IPs were freely available, this would indeed be a simpler life in many ways. And yet it's such a distant fantasy now that it's understandable (though a little funny) to hear you describe it as "additional complexity" when, depending on how you look at it, the opposite is true...

From a modern perspective, you're absolutely right. The tables have really been turned, we have taken the limitation of IP addresses in stride, we have built elaborate systems of tools and layers of abstraction that not only turn these IP-shortage lemons into lemonade, the way we've virtualized the connections through featureful and easily-configurable software layers like private IP ranges, IP masquerading, proxies and tunnels can be used to achieve immense flexibility and reliable security. Most software now natively supports handling multiple services on a single IP or even a single port, and in some cases it requires it. This was not always the case.

It's sort of like the divide between hardware RAID and software RAID. Once upon a time, software RAID was slow, messy, confusing, unreliable, and distinctly inferior to "true" hardware RAID, which was plug-and-play with powerful configuration options. Nobody would willingly use software RAID if they had any other choice, the best RAID cards were sold for thousands of dollars and motherboards advertised how much hardware RAID they had built-in. But over time, as CPUs and software became faster and more powerful, the tide changed, and people started to realize that actually, hardware RAID was the one that left you tied to an expensive proprietary controller that could fail or become obsolete and leave your array a difficult to migrate or recover mess, whereas software RAID was reliable, predictable, upgradable, supporting a wide variety of disk types and layouts while still performing solidly and was generally far nicer to work with. It became the more common configuration, and found its way into almost every OS. You can now set up software RAID simply by clicking an option in a menu, even in Windows, and it basically works flawlessly without any additional thought.

Times change, we adapt to the technologies that are most common and that work the best in the situations we're using them in, and we make them better until they're not just a last resort anymore, but become a first choice, while the old way becomes a confusing anachronism. That's what multiple public IPs have become nowadays, for most purposes.

That's exactly my point. If they do in a few days "come back from" that and are all buddy buddy again, then I think that indicates it was just a staged performance for show and distraction and none of it was real fighting. Suggests it was all just an act. (IF they do come back from it. Which remains to be seen)

Muskrat has already backed down from a few things he said in the "heat" of the argument, like that he was going to disassemble the Dragon capsules. So I wouldn't jump to your conclusion that they can't possibly "come back from" this, my point is just that if they do, it was probably all just an act to begin with because I agree if it's real, stuff was said that neither one of these vindictive sociopaths is likely to forget.

I'm putting 50/50 odds that it's an intentional, theatrical distraction from other more important things that are going on, or it's just the inevitable outcome of two malignant narcissist sociopaths being in the same room together too often. If they quickly kiss and make up I'll lean more towards the former than the latter.

It also sounds like sealioning. So yeah genocide denial by either shutting you up or making you appear to be the bigot would be the goal.

The problem honestly isn't even the seawater, necessarily. Even that is technically fixable.

Where it gets potentially unfixable is that most naval architects seem to think that the ship probably twisted her keel lying in that position. Non-naval-architects might not appreciate what a catastrophic problem that is, to put it roughly in automotive terms that's like having a twisted frame on a car (it's actually significantly worse, but that's the closest layperson analogy you're likely to get). There's nothing you can do to to a twisted frame to exactly straighten it, and it will never drive "properly" again, in fact it can be extremely unstable and unsafe. Cars that this happens to are basically without exception considered "totaled" and for good reason.

Ships, in general, and warships, in particular, can be put under pretty extreme forces by the water they are in, especially at high speeds or heavy seas, and even small imperfections in the shape of the hull can cause very serious hydrodynamic drag and forces. These effects can be even stronger and more dramatic than aerodynamic effects on cars or airplanes since the water itself is so much thicker and heavier as a fluid. A ship with a twisted hull is almost certainly a write-off, and if you stubbornly refuse to accept that and do everything you can to mitigate it, even if you are lucky it will still likely be a poor, dangerous sailer that can never safely approach anything near the sort of speeds it was originally designed to achieve. A warship that can only go half the speed, and half the range it was designed to, with a non-negligible chance that it may be so poorly handling that it is at least uncomfortable and hard to crew, if not actually dangerous or even doomed in heavy weather, is not a very useful warship, no matter how hard you are committed to putting it into service despite the damage.

Yeah, maybe it still floats, but that's only a small part of what a ship is actually expected to be able to do in the real world, and "modern warship" is a pretty unforgiving role that needs every bit of performance the ship is supposed to be able to provide. It's not a situation where you can accept having a scratch-and-dent salvage title if you want it to actually be good at its job. That's why people are considering this a total loss (and it still will be no matter how much work they put into it).

If Trump nationalized it out of petty vindictiveness I wouldn't criticize him for that. I'd still criticize literally everything else, but even a broken clock can be right twice a day and maybe this could be Trump's moment to be right by accident.

Even the WWW was actually popularized first in the US, specifically NCSA made the first web browser with inline image support which is the origin story for every modern browser (and is part of why every browser's "User-Agent" identifies itself as some variety of "Mozilla"... the "Mo-" comes originally from Mosaic).

Of course they were not the only people ever involved at any step or of any specific technology, exclusively, but the US played a huge and honestly significantly outsized part in the initial development of the internet as we know it, and that continued for decades (and arguably still does). That's why they can and do claim responsibility. Because in very large part, they are responsible. It's not unfair to acknowledge facts. Someone had to lead the way. That was the US. Others followed, and helped, and sometimes led a little bit of the way in a particular area. But mostly, the US led the way to the modern Internet, leveraging both significant government funding and the tech-utopians of academia, then-established-but-now-forgotten tech industry veterans like Xerox and DEC, and the capitalist innovators of Silicon Valley to attract and support the best people and ideas they could use to win almost every tech race they participated in, which was almost all of them.

Between Agent Krasnov and Agent Muskovite I'm sure they already have full access, this is just their way of getting a dig in at everyone who already knows this is the case. The Kremlin is basically rubbing it in our faces to tell us they own all these guys and they know there's nothing we can do about it.

Yeah a good analogy is refloating the Costa Concordia. They patched the hole and emptied the water and it certainly floated, fixing the hole in the hull wasn't the problem. Refloating it didn't return it to passenger service, it was just step one of being scrapped, because that's all you can do with a ship like that short of completely rebuilding it from scratch. Repairing it would be vastly more complex, risky, and expensive than simply replacing it. It's salvage and scrap, that's all. You get it out of the way so its not blocking your route as a hazard to navigation, anything you can salvage you salvage, then you scrap it.

Now, on the other hand, if you wanted to do some theatrical performance of how you are the greatest and most resourceful country on Earth, you could certainly refloat it and jury rig it piecemeal until it looks like a perfectly functional ship again, as long as nobody has to go inside and it never has to perform any significant functions. If you want to use it as a floating barge to launch missiles from (like the first of its class, which is rumoured to have no engines as it has never been seen moving under its own power) then absolutely you can refloat it and use it for that no problem. That might be a good way to save face if you're a recently-embarrassed despotic banana republic with nuclear weapons and no functioning economy, and plausibly that is what will happen here.

We are reinventing our way back to Web 1.0, pretty soon we will be teaching people that they can design their own sites using simple tools or even just by typing in plain text and that they can use "links" to connect to other people's content anywhere else on the web.

And because this probably sounds like a facetious criticism, I need to clarify: it's really not a criticism at all. This is how the web is supposed to work. Companies broke it in order to entrap you and make profit from you.

When something seems too good to be true, it usually is. Carney definitely seemed to be entering that territory in the run up to the election, so I've always reserved some suspicion. At this point if they form a coalition government with the conservatives, as laughable as that idea seems, then we know we've definitely been had.