[-] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Whats the problem with creating one message and using the APIs for posting it on all social medai? With optional formatting per platform?

[-] [email protected] 39 points 3 months ago

Strange that Spain and Norway don't have its own instance. Big countries

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I mean yeah, doesnt matter. The point is people shared alternatives to big tech just like folks who are not in the power right now. Cause apparently x is musk's and it looks like the consensus is that rest of big tech is siding with Trump for profit

[-] [email protected] 62 points 3 months ago

It's crazy how the wind changed. Does anyone remeber the almost exact same thing 4 years ago, when people on the right side of political spectrum shared alternatives to big tech from their point ov view? GAB.COM, PARLER, BRAVE, DUCKDUCKGO etc

XD

[-] [email protected] 28 points 3 months ago

That's a lot of money.

17
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

It was probably suggested before, but the topic is not raised too often so here goes the solution:

  1. We introduce two types of threads - normal and "controversial/heated/political" (probably there is a better name)

Normal type is for "technical" discussions, where the best answer is accepted as best by some very large percentage of people, lest say 90-99%. The treshold could be a matter of discussion, but you get the idea. So that would be questions like "How to fix dead radiator in PC", "Whats best way to do this or that"

Controversial is for discussion where there is potentially lot of disagreement, but also where there could be just some disagreement, but we want to hear other points of view. So all of the political things, questions about genders, etc, everythign that creates heated conversation. Probably could also be used for humourous topics.

The thread type is set while opening a thread, but it can be changed any time during the discussion by forum moderator

  1. We leave normal type discussion as they are on reddit/lemmy whatever. For controversial first when user enters the thread, all of the comments are sorted in random order. All of the comments vote scores are hidden. Now user casts votes in "one go". Only until they finish casting votes, other votes are visible for them. Changing already casted votes on these threads is NOT POSSIBLE. They unfortunately cant vote on new comments which were added after they voted. THey are only allowed to vote once. TBH users dont usually come back to threads after they visited them once so its not like we make some common behaviour impossible

This way we eliminate sheep behaviour and demand making their own decision by user. And we force user to be responsible for making a decision. Someone might argue that we sometimes change mind, but it doesnt matter, cause the number of times we change minds is really tiny and the gained changed behaviour is far more valuable. After everything is visible for user they can now sort by most popular comments which is now available.

That should be it. We also might introduce thread freezing if necessary.

What do you think? And also, since lemmy is open source, do you think there is a change that some bigger instance migght create a fork that introduces some of these changes as an experiment?

[-] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

TLDR from AI Chat about whats this all about:

This guy is deep in thought about existence, change, and the nature of reality. He reflects on how everything is in constant motion—our bodies, emotions, even the universe itself. He’s exploring mindfulness, non-attachment, and going with the flow instead of resisting life’s natural rhythms. He sees time as an illusion, emotions as energy, and life as an interconnected dance. Ultimately, he’s embracing presence, letting go of control, and finding beauty in the ever-changing now.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

yup its what I was thinking as well. Reddit might deliberately run ai bots to fake traffic.

8
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

WTF dude. You mentioned Asia. I love Asians. Asia is vast. There are many countries, not just China bro. I think you need to do these reflections. Im talking about very specific case of Chinese Deepseek devs potentiall lying about the chips. The assumptions and generalizations you are thinking of are crazy.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Did they? According to their repo its still WIP https://github.com/huggingface/open-r1

[-] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

well if they really are and methodology can be replicated, we are surely about to see some crazy number of deepseek comptention, cause imagine how many us companies in ai and finance sector exist out there that are in posession of even larger number of chips than chinese clamied to have trained their model on.

Although the question rises - if the methodology is so novel why would these folks make it opensource? Why would they share results of years of their work to the public losing their edge over competition? I dont understand.

Can somebody who actually knows how to read machine learning codebase tell us something about deepseek after reading their code?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

So are these techiques so novel and breaktrough? Will we now have a burst of deepseek like models everywhere? Cause that's what absolutely should happen if the whole storey is true. I would assume there are dozens or even hundreds of companies in USA that are in a posession of similar number but surely more chips that Chinese folks claimed to trained their model on, especially in finance sector and just AI reserach focused.

1
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Cause I opened this post https://lemmy.world/post/25293743 where they complain that there are some conservative subreddits on reddit now.

3
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
61
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Interacting on instances which are not yet discoverd and connected to instance where we are registered is pain in the ass. Copying URL into search bar? That is really repelling. I'm sure it was discussed before but I can't find this discussion. How to make it easier? Do devs need to make changes to protocol or it's enough and it can be done within the apps themselves? How close are we to the solution?

7
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
28
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

My lemmy users per capita guess: 1. Russia 2. Finland. I can understand Russia cause developers are from there but why Finland?

1
Rockstar (lui.fedit.pl)
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
POE2 wczoraj (fedit.pl)
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 38 points 9 months ago

Why? What happened?

1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
Is this accurate? (www.tiktok.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

btw Why is the link displayed like that? "access denied"...

view more: next ›

legolas

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 1 year ago