this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
1018 points (98.8% liked)

linuxmemes

21047 readers
1639 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

    The banking apps I've tried don't require SafetyNet, instead they use Android AOSP's basicIntegrity. The latter doesn't require certification by Google, but also checks whether the device is rooted and the bootloader is locked.

    This means custom ROM's on most devices won't pass basicIntegrity, as only Google Pixel, ~~OnePlus~~ and Fairphone allow for relocking the bootloader.

    [–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    OnePlus no longer supports that as of ~ColorOS~ OxygenOS 12 unfortunately.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

    That's a bummer. Seems like Google Pixel and Fairphone are the only ones left. I don't even know why manufacturers wouldn't allow for relocking or even unlocking of their phones. I can't imagine they make much money with user data and the phone is already paid for. Warranty claims shouldn't be much of an issue either, as modifications can be easily detected and it's likely not a relevant amount of people anyway.

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

    As I understand it, the stated purpose is to prevent supply chain attacks and ultimately possible damage to their brand. In practice many of these same vendors ship their own spyware and do not want it removed.