616
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Looks ugly until you need to implement something and realize you've been blessed with a description of business logic.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

Strong names are great, but (sometimes) mentioning the type of variable in the name is redundant.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Until they find out that the way to descriptive variables or functions needs to be extended with new business logic requiring renaming of functions again and again.

I think maintaining code with this level of verbose naming, will be a pain over time. If they don't let the naming slip, and then they could as well use cryptic 3 letter names.

this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
616 points (98.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

36796 readers
271 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS