this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
118 points (87.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43974 readers
707 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The monotheistic all powerful one.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

To some people the answer is obviously box A β€” you get $1,000,000 because the predictor is perfect. To others, the answer is obviously to pick both, because no matter what the predictor said, it's already done and your decision can't change the past, so picking both boxes will always net you $1000 more than picking just one. Neither argument has any obvious flaw. That's the paradox.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Also, thanks for taking me down an interesting rabbit hole. I'd never heard of that paradox before and enjoyed reading up on it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My flaw with the two-box choice is that the predictor is - in some way or another - always described as "perfect". Two-boxer people are contrarians!

~ Firm One-boxer

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's only the one-boxers who describe the predictor as β€œperfect”, presumably interpolating from the observation that the predictor has always been right so far. Two-boxers might argue that you have no idea if the predictor is perfect or whether they've just been incredibly lucky so far, but also, they will argue that this is irrelevant because the boxes have already been set up and your choice cannot change it anymore.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Interesting. Thanks for sharing that perspective πŸ€”