this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
556 points (76.1% liked)

Memes

45728 readers
961 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a jump, from "I'd eat a human" to necessitating the human have been purposefully killed to be consumed. The previous poster even pretty clearly said not wanting to waste meat, implying the human was already dead and would just be burnt/buried otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So you're against the farming of animals then and just support eating road kill and such?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I definitely didn't say that. My views on eating animals isn't relevant to this conversation. Just pointing out you're framing the words the previous poster used in a vastly different light than what they said. Kinda like you tried to do to mine.

That said, honestly yeah, if you accidentally kill an animal, use it's meat.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They said they would eat humans if it was legal and healthy so no i wasn't being unreasonable. Also there is no difference between killing a human and killing another animal so supporting eating one and not the other is hypocrisy of the highest order.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's absolutely a difference between killing a human and killing an animal, but I'm not getting into THAT debate right now.

Correct! They said they'd eat a human if it was legal and healthy. They did not say they supported killing anyone. The specific words people choose are important, and if you're going to respond to something they didn't say, you're at BEST strawmanning the argument.

Edit: amazing to a, thanks autocorrect