Asklemmy

43852 readers

1142 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Which games that were reviewed poorly did you actually like? (lemmy.world)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

66 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Personally never had a problem with Victoria 3. A bit buggy on release but nothing game breaking

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Has Been Heroes. It's a rougelite where you have to control three heroes across three lanes of action. You have to juggle skills and lanes by rotating the heroes to time attacks and perks. It may be more that it went notices than reviewed poorly.

One that definitely was reviewed poorly that I loved though was Advent Rising. It's a scifi 3rd person shooter with the story by Orson Scott Card. It ended up in legal trouble due to a botched prize they did on release. Worst part is it ends on a cliff hanger and they never made the sequel or released the comics that were supposed to add to the story.