you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

The Constitution is meant to be read in plain text. The hunting for extra definitions and meanings in and of itself destroys the legitimacy of this ruling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That's funny because you would have to hunt for extra definitions to find something other than what the court ruled. This was a pretty cut and dry case.

    Regardless, to claim the constitution is meant to be read "in plain text" is laughable. And to presume you know more about the constitution than nine Supreme Court justices in agreement on this matter is just embarrassing for you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment