view the rest of the comments
cyph3rPunk
The people in this community hope for a world where an individual's informational footprints—everything from an opinion on abortion to the medical record of an actual abortion—can be traced only if the individual involved chooses to reveal them; a world where coherent messages shoot around the globe by network and microwave, but intruders and feds trying to pluck them out of the vapor find only gibberish; a world where the tools of prying are transformed into the instruments of privacy. There is only one way this vision will materialize, and that is by widespread use of cryptography. Is this technologically possible? Definitely. The obstacles are political—some of the most powerful forces in government are devoted to the control of these tools. In short, there is a war going on between those who would liberate crypto and those who would suppress it. The seemingly innocuous bunch strewn around this community represents the vanguard of the pro-crypto forces. Though the battleground seems remote, the stakes are not: The outcome of this struggle may determine the amount of freedom our society will grant us in the 21st century. To the Cypherpunks, freedom is an issue worth some risk.
Relevant Links:
"Security is mostly a superstition. It does not exist in nature, nor do the children of man as a whole experience it. Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. Life is either a daring adventure, or nothing." Helen Keller
I guess cypherpunks aren't strictly the same as crypto-anarchists, but this feels like sort of odd fare for this community? Maybe my idea of what cypherpunks are has been colored by hanging around with Bitcoin people for so long.
Overall I'm not huge on pushing for positive rights. The only negative right I see on this list is "the right to cross borders", aka freedom of movement, which is something that I'm very much in favor of. I guess from a mutualist perspective, "freedom from eviction" would also be a negative right, since ownership is supposed to be based on occupancy and use.
For anyone that's not familiar with the terms, a negative right is a right not to have something imposed on you, where a positive right is a right to be provided with something.
I try to just be myself. Maybe that doesn't exactly fit with the perfect, quintessential definition of cypherpunk but I am trying to populate almost an entire community with content that resonates with me. I am a person who strongly identifies with the cypherpunks. From my perspective, they created some of the only virtually tamper-proof technologies still in existence today. I try to remember their ethos when adding content.
Honestly, my mission for this community is to help the everyday person become more knowledgeable about the possibilities of technology & cryptography while also trying to recruit and gently guide talented software engineers and thinkers that may wander into our midst to create technologies and content that will guide society in a direction that not only stops corruption and sociopathy but makes them impossible under their watchful, just eye.
The press has been dead since around 2017. It's time for guerrilla information-exchange.