this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
194 points (83.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

9697 readers
738 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Pros of golf carts and neighborhood electric vehicles (NEVs) replacing all private cars within a city:

  • Only goes as fast as a bicycle, so isn't a viable suburban commuter vehicle, meaning you'll probably only take it to the nearest transit station
  • Only goes as fast as a bicycle, so isn't likely to kill people
  • Excellent visibility, so less likely to run over children
  • Much smaller and lighter, so building parking garages for park-and-rides would be a lot cheaper and less objectionable than with our current style of cars
  • Electric
  • Smaller batteries than jumbo EVs
  • Compatible with dense, transit-oriented city development
  • Could be installed with mandatory speed limiters

Cons:

  • Less profit for GM and ExxonMobil
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

People who choose to live in rural areas are always going to be more wasteful and require subsidization from urban people's taxes. Putting them all in golf carts was never going to solve that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Are you doing a bit? If not, what do you mean by "are always going to be more wasteful"?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Urban taxes pay for suburban and rural services all across the continent. Suburbanite and rural residents cost more to support than they pay in taxes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Do you believe that communities that are supported by tax dollars are inherently more wasteful than communities that aren't? There is a reason US farmers get so much tax money from the government. Do you know what that reason is?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm not even talking about the vast farm subsidies from lobbying and regulatory capture. We don't even need to consider that for the point to remain.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Your point is moot and your username is fitting.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And we will all be fed from the rolling fields of Manhattan.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

So what you are saying is, I should subsidize the lifestyle of people who are living under conditions with greater externalities because they want to make money farming. Hey. How about they fucking pay for it themselves? They make more money per capita, they enjoy greater privilege, all I am saying is that they can pay their fair share. It's not like they are doing it out of altruism.